2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
171
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
171
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the classification analysis of images with very high spatial resolution, object-based approaches are superior over pixel-based approaches when the pixel size is significantly smaller than the average size of the objects of interest [37,38]. Immitzer et al also found that by classifying objects instead of pixels, the user accuracies could increase significantly for most tree species in a forest study of a temperate zone [2], and the positive impact was higher for conifers than broadleaved trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the classification analysis of images with very high spatial resolution, object-based approaches are superior over pixel-based approaches when the pixel size is significantly smaller than the average size of the objects of interest [37,38]. Immitzer et al also found that by classifying objects instead of pixels, the user accuracies could increase significantly for most tree species in a forest study of a temperate zone [2], and the positive impact was higher for conifers than broadleaved trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the objects are classified using spectral as well as spatial information such as texture, shape and context features to more clearly distinguish spectrally similar land cover types. Most comparative studies that have compared OBIA and pixel classification approaches reported that OBIA provides the most accurate results (e.g., [19][20][21][22][23]). Recent advances in OBIA have revolutionized the processing of high to very high spatial resolution remote sensing data by providing effective computer-assisted classification techniques whose results are close to the quality of manual photo-interpretation, while also being much faster, cheaper and reproducible over large areas (e.g., [6,7]).…”
Section: Mapping Artificial Areas From Obiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the size of the study area (and mapping regions), collecting field data for the control sample would normally be extremely labor-intensive and time-consuming. As suggested by [22] and [36], selected control objects were photo-interpreted using the image with the highest spatial resolution as control data. To ensure photo interpretation was objective, the classified map was not viewed during the process and the manual photo interpretation was made by an experienced photo-interpreter who was not involved in developing the method.…”
Section: Map Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach allows use of multiple image elements, parameters and scales such as texture, shape and context, as opposed to pixel-based classification that solely relies on the pixel value. Overall, OBIA has been proven to produce more accurate classification results compared to pixel-based approaches using medium to high resolution imagery, producing improvements in classification accuracy ranging from 9-23% [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%