2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15384-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Ontologies Using Multi-agent System and Knowledge Base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the semantic level, Rodriguez and Egenhofer (2003) and Bai (2013) suggest an integrated assessment by comparing concepts using synonym sets, distinguishing features (specifically their functions, parts and attributes), and semantic neighborhoods, to obtain a measure of semantic similarity between concepts of different ontologies. A similar strategy was followed in Håkansson et al (2010), where a knowledge base is used to reason about the contents of the ontologies to find suitable concept matches. Corpus statistical information is another approach to semantic comparison; in particular, information content (Resnik, 1995), a technique that measures the level of informativeness of nodes in a taxonomy by calculating their probability of occurrence, is used in Cho et al (2007) to compute semantic similarity between concepts from different ontologies.…”
Section: Comparing Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the semantic level, Rodriguez and Egenhofer (2003) and Bai (2013) suggest an integrated assessment by comparing concepts using synonym sets, distinguishing features (specifically their functions, parts and attributes), and semantic neighborhoods, to obtain a measure of semantic similarity between concepts of different ontologies. A similar strategy was followed in Håkansson et al (2010), where a knowledge base is used to reason about the contents of the ontologies to find suitable concept matches. Corpus statistical information is another approach to semantic comparison; in particular, information content (Resnik, 1995), a technique that measures the level of informativeness of nodes in a taxonomy by calculating their probability of occurrence, is used in Cho et al (2007) to compute semantic similarity between concepts from different ontologies.…”
Section: Comparing Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision-making uses production rules, in a knowledge base, that corresponds to the incoming data 15 . The decision-making can discern the relevant data by comparing the concepts and categories stored on the MINi-Me device with the incoming data and information using context comparison 16 with deductive and inductive reasoning.…”
Section: Contextual-based Decision-making Using Individualised Mini-mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies represent knowledge in a specific domain. The ontologies can define terminologies, describe domain, apply structures and build relationships between concepts (Håkansson, Hartung, Moradian, and Wu, 2010). Moreover, ontologies enable analysis and reuse of domain knowledge.…”
Section: Security Ontology Designmentioning
confidence: 99%