2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/aupec.2017.8282482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing operational value of CSP with TES to PV with battery storage in Australian national electricity market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ability of CSP-TES to displace more high-cost conventional generators than PV-BES can be attributed to the inherent advantage of CSP-TES being that it can store a larger fraction of the solar energy than PV-BES because of the greater power capacity of the storage system (Table 1), consistent with [48,61], in addition to the use of tracking and the non-sensitivity to high temperatures occurring during summer periods. On the other hand, PV-BES generation with small storage system (Table 1) only shares the peak load but would not be able to satisfy the whole peak load over the time, which illustrates the increasing imbalances variability in meeting the load and thus fluctuating following the weather.…”
Section: System Adequacy Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This ability of CSP-TES to displace more high-cost conventional generators than PV-BES can be attributed to the inherent advantage of CSP-TES being that it can store a larger fraction of the solar energy than PV-BES because of the greater power capacity of the storage system (Table 1), consistent with [48,61], in addition to the use of tracking and the non-sensitivity to high temperatures occurring during summer periods. On the other hand, PV-BES generation with small storage system (Table 1) only shares the peak load but would not be able to satisfy the whole peak load over the time, which illustrates the increasing imbalances variability in meeting the load and thus fluctuating following the weather.…”
Section: System Adequacy Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 98%