2013
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-10742013000200036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing OSNR based policies for an adaptive-alternative IA-RWA algorithm applied to all-optical networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One set includes a number of real or planned topologies, and another set includes a number of regular topologies. The first set comprises the COST239 network (11 nodes, 26 links) [21], the Finland network (12 nodes, 19 links) [22], the NSFNET network (14 nodes, 21 links) [23], the EON network (19 nodes, 36 links) [21] and the UBN network (24 nodes, 42 links) [21]. The second set comprises star topologies (see Table 1) and other well-known regular topologies, described in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One set includes a number of real or planned topologies, and another set includes a number of regular topologies. The first set comprises the COST239 network (11 nodes, 26 links) [21], the Finland network (12 nodes, 19 links) [22], the NSFNET network (14 nodes, 21 links) [23], the EON network (19 nodes, 36 links) [21] and the UBN network (24 nodes, 42 links) [21]. The second set comprises star topologies (see Table 1) and other well-known regular topologies, described in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed review of such approaches can be found in [10]. Recent works on RWA include an adaptive-alternative routing algorithm for all-optical networks that selects the route considering OSNR restrictions [11]; an ant colony optimization approach to solve the grooming, routing, and wavelength assignment problem considering mixed line rate and physical impairments [12]; and an adaptive approach to choose the most efficient forward error correction (FEC) for different lightpaths based on their individual OSNRs [13].…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%