Comparing performance among male and female candidates in sex-specific clinical knowledge in the MRCGP

Abstract

BackgroundPatients often seek doctors of the same sex, particularly for sex-specific complaints and also because of a perception that doctors have greater knowledge of complaints relating to their own sex. Few studies have investigated differences in knowledge by sex of candidate on sex-specific questions in medical examinations. AimThe aim was to compare the performance of males and females in sex-specific questions in a 200-item computer-based applied knowledge test for licensing UK GPs. Design and settingA cross-sectional design using routinely collected performance and demographic data from the first three versions of the Applied Knowledge Test, MRCGP, UK. MethodQuestions were classified as female specific, male specific, or sex neutral. The performance of males and females was analysed using multiple analysis of covariance after adjusting for sex-neutral score and demographic confounders. ResultsData were included from 3627 candidates. After adjusting for sex-neutral score, age, time since qualification, year of speciality training, ethnicity, and country of primary medical qualification, there were differences in performance in sexspecific questions. Males performed worse than females on female-specific questions (-4.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.7 to -2.6) but did not perform significantly better than females on male-specific questions (0.3%, 95% CI = -2.6 to 3.2%. ConclusionThere was evidence of better performance by females in female-specific questions but this was small relative to the size of the test. Differential performance of males and females in sexspecific questions in a licensing examination may have implications for vocational and postqualification general practice training. Keywords assessment; general practice; learning; medical education; primary health care; sex.

Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates

“…GP selection comprises written and face-to-face assessments, and potential sex differences on those assessments were not taken into account in our analysis of offers. Performance in GP selection has been found to predict subsequent performance in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners exit examinations,35 in which women outperform men 36 37. As such, the relationship between sex differences in offers and sex differences within GP training also merits further exploration.…”

Sex and gender in medical education: a national student survey

“…Additionally, in a study where males and females were asked to answer sex and gender specific test questions, males were less likely than females to answer female specific questions correctly. However, females correctly answered male-specific questions at the same frequency as males [ 15 ]. Taken together, these differences raise an interesting question about how gender influences perception and learning.…”

Performance in candidates declaring versus those not declaring dyslexia in a licensing clinical examination

“…Finally, we used a multivariable negative binomial regression model (because of results skewed towards passing candidates) to show the effect of declaring dyslexia on passing the CSA, taking into account scaled mark at first attempt (Table 4), number of attempts, sex of candidate, place of primary medical qualification and ethnicity, which have been found to be important covariates in previous studies (see Table 5). 9,15 We excluded the deanery of GP training because this did not add to the model (log pseudolikelihood without deanery = À20 318.4, R 2 = 0.005 versus log pseudolikelihood with deanery = À20 317.7, R 2 = 0.005). We included the scaled mark at the first CSA attempt (Table 4) because data for second and later attempts are known to be highly non-normal due to those having second attempts necessarily having failed the first attempt.…”