Comparing pharmacy practice faculty perceptions of first-year post-graduate residency (PGY1) selection criteria to those reported by PGY1 residency directors

Blake, Elizabeth W.; Friesner, Daniel; Gettig, Jacob P.; Hajjar, Emily R.; Gentry, Elmer J.; Kline, Jonathan M

doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2014.09.009

Cited by 21 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…9 Conversely, 29.3% and 35.3% of directors indicated that these two criteria, respectively, were not among the top five criteria they use to select residency candidates for interviews. 9 Criteria such as extracurricular activities, advanced degrees, and research experience were reported as less important to PGY1 program directors. 9 While 65.1% of PGY1 directors reported extracurricular activities as a selection criterion for their program, 57.3% reported that this criterion was not among the top five criteria used to select residency candidates for interviews.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Blake et al conducted a survey of PGY1 residency program directors (n5232) and found that approximately 85% included evidence of leadership and previous work experience as interview selection criteria. 9 However, only about 6-7% of directors indicated that these were the most important selection criteria. 9 Conversely, 29.3% and 35.3% of directors indicated that these two criteria, respectively, were not among the top five criteria they use to select residency candidates for interviews.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 However, only about 6-7% of directors indicated that these were the most important selection criteria. 9 Conversely, 29.3% and 35.3% of directors indicated that these two criteria, respectively, were not among the top five criteria they use to select residency candidates for interviews. 9 Criteria such as extracurricular activities, advanced degrees, and research experience were reported as less important to PGY1 program directors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 Criteria such as extracurricular activities, advanced degrees, and research experience were reported as less important to PGY1 program directors. 9 While 65.1% of PGY1 directors reported extracurricular activities as a selection criterion for their program, 57.3% reported that this criterion was not among the top five criteria used to select residency candidates for interviews. A multivariate analysis of factors that were significantly associated with invitation to interview at one residency program (Johns Hopkins Hospital) included professional association involvement, presentations, practices experiences, publications, pharmacy work experience, pharmacy school GPA, and skills and certifications.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Approximately 94% of PGY1 directors reported using pharmacy GPA as a selection criterion, and 13.4% indicated pharmacy GPA was the most important criterion assessed for selecting candidates for interviews. 9 Future studies should attempt to clarify whether a higher pharmacy school GPA is associated with match status as a result of director preference or candidate aptitude.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Student Characteristics Associated with Successful Matching to a PGY1 Residency Program

Phillips

McLaughlin

Rose

et al. 2016

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To identify predictors for postgraduate matching success. Methods. In April 2014, a survey was distributed to students at five schools of pharmacy in the United States assessing organizational involvement, research and work experience, postgraduation plans, match status, and demographics. Results. Five hundred seventy-seven students (82%) completed the survey. Applicants who matched had a higher median number of interview offers compared to those who did not match. Significantly more females than males applied for a residency program. Those who matched had a higher median pharmacy school grade point average (GPA) compared to those who did not. No differences were observed in the rates of matching when leadership positions, student organizational membership, or previous work experience were considered. Conclusion. For pharmacy students in this study, number of applications and interviews, pharmacy school GPA, and female gender were associated with a higher likelihood of matching.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Student Characteristics Associated with Successful Matching to a PGY1 Residency Program

Phillips

McLaughlin

Rose

et al. 2016

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surveying the selection landscape: A systematic review of processes for selecting postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residents and key implications

Reed

Noel

Heil

et al. 2020

J Am Coll Clin Pharm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe growth in applicants to postgraduate year one (PGY1) pharmacy residency programs outpaces the number of available positions, requiring that residency program directors (RPDs) evaluate an increasing number of qualified candidates. Discrepancies exist in the characteristics thought to distinguish exemplary candidates and the methods for selecting them.ObjectivesTo characterize the burdens of the selection process, summarize methods for selecting PGY1 residents based on a systematic review, and list best practices for improving the process.MethodsBurdens were characterized by collecting applicant costs via survey and program costs and workload estimates via interviews of RPDs at small, medium, and large programs. For the systematic review, a medical librarian searched for articles pertaining to resident selection. Articles underwent a title/abstract screen and full text screen by two authors and a third served as tiebreaker. Data were summarized in descriptive form, and consisted of study methodology, selection method(s) of interest, and principal findings.ResultsThe median cost to applicants was $1756 (interquartile range [IQR] $1271‐$2423). The median cost to residency programs was $5068 (IQR $3943‐$12 310). Program directors spent a median of 56.5 hours on selection; a median of 22.0 and 21.3 hours were spent by each preceptor and current resident, respectively. A total of 51 articles (22 surveys and 29 other designs) were included in the systematic review. Biographical data, interviews, and references were among the most commonly explored evaluation methods. Articles consisted primarily of descriptions of selection methods, summaries of RPD attitudes regarding these methods or characteristics desired in a resident, or factors that predicted a successful match. Few articles investigated the validity and reliability of selection methods.ConclusionSelection is a cumbersome process for both applicants and programs alike. Fortunately, numerous opportunities exist to improve the process, and these should serve as the basis of future research.

show abstract

Letters of reference for PGY1 pharmacy residency candidates: A survey of residency program directors and opinion statement

Skrupky

Dy-Boarman

Gurgle

et al. 2020

J Am Coll Clin Pharm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionAlthough letters of reference (LORs) are required for postgraduate year one (PGY1) residency applications and used to distinguish between candidates, an evaluation of residency program director (RPD) perceptions and values surrounding LORs has not been described.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to describe PGY1 RPDs' processes, values, and perceptions surrounding LORs.MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional descriptive survey. After assessing content validity, the Education and Training Practice and Research Network (PRN) taskforce sent a 25‐item electronic survey to 1266 PGY1 RPDs. Survey questions captured program demographics, LOR requirements, processes for LOR review, and perceptions about the value of LORs. Two open‐ended questions solicited suggestions for LORs and the existing standardized form; responses were evaluated via thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 291 (24%) programs completed the survey. LORs were rated as extremely or quite valuable by 82% of respondents and moderately valuable by 16% of respondents. Scoring rubrics for LOR evaluation were used by 79% of programs, and performance ratings were reported to impact interview consideration by a majority of programs. Accuracy, detailed comments, and inclusion of specific candidate strengths and areas for improvement were rated as extremely or quite important characteristics by 90% or more of respondents. Specific strengths were reported to be present in LORs more than half of the time by 81% of programs; however, accuracy, detailed comments, and inclusion of specific areas for improvement were only reported to be present about half the time or less by 41%, 63%, and 63% of respondents. Among 207 suggestions submitted to improve LOR utility, common themes included a desire for LOR authors to have candid discussions with candidates prior to letter writing, to contextualize their relationship with the candidate, and provide honest and specific assessments.ConclusionLORs remain highly valued by PGY1 RPDs during application review. Several notable findings were observed, resulting in recommendations for LOR authors, residency applicants, and the standardized LOR form.

show abstract

Comparing pharmacy practice faculty perceptions of first-year post-graduate residency (PGY1) selection criteria to those reported by PGY1 residency directors

Cited by 21 publications

References 14 publications

Student Characteristics Associated with Successful Matching to a PGY1 Residency Program

Student Characteristics Associated with Successful Matching to a PGY1 Residency Program

Surveying the selection landscape: A systematic review of processes for selecting postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residents and key implications

Letters of reference for PGY1 pharmacy residency candidates: A survey of residency program directors and opinion statement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About