Comparing PTSD symptom networks in type I vs. type II trauma survivors

Abstract

Background: Network analysis has gained increasing attention as a new framework to study complex associations between symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A number of studies have been published to investigate symptom networks on different sets of symptoms in different populations, and the findings have been inconsistent. Objective: We aimed to extend previous research by testing whether differences in PTSD symptom networks can be found in survivors of type I (single event; sudden and unexpected, high levels of acute threat) vs. type II (repeated and/or protracted; anticipated) trauma (with regard to their index trauma). Method: Participants were trauma-exposed individuals with elevated levels of PTSD symptomatology, most of whom (94%) were undergoing assessment in preparation for PTSD treatment in several treatment centres in Germany and Switzerland ( n = 286 with type I and n = 187 with type II trauma). We estimated Bayesian Gaussian graphical models for each trauma group and explored group differences in the symptom network. Results: First, for both trauma types, our analyses identified the edges that were repeatedly reported in previous network studies. Second, there was decisive evidence that the two networks were generated from different multivariate normal distributions, i.e. the networks differed on a global level. Third, explorative edge-wise comparisons showed moderate or strong evidence for specific 12 edges. Edges which emerged as especially important in distinguishing the networks were between intrusions and flashbacks, highlighting the stronger positive association in the group of type II trauma survivors compared to type I survivors. Flashbacks showed a similar pattern of results in the associations with detachment and sleep problems (type II > type I). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that trauma type contributes to the heterogeneity in the symptom network. Future research on PTSD symptom networks should include this variable in the analyses to reduce heterogeneity.

Dynamic symptom associations in posttraumatic stress disorder: a network approach

“…Fourth, we tested a heterogenous sample of trauma survivors with PTSD. However, there is a first indication from a cross-sectional network study that trauma type may be a moderator (Stefanovic et al, 2022 ). Therefore, future studies should include other variables such as frequent comorbid symptoms (e.g.…”

Association between sense of coherence and health and well-being among older survivors of a natural disaster: a prospective outcome-wide study

“…Traumatic stress studies have separately considered the single-incident traumatic event (e.g., traffic accident) known as type I trauma and persistent trauma exposures (e.g., interpersonal conflicts), also known as type II trauma 23 . And, they also have suggested that type II trauma exposures might have stronger associations with PTSS severity than type I traumatic experiences 24 . Our respondents have reported prolonged suffering owing to the disaster.…”

Moral Injury Post-COVID-19: More Than Military? A Theological Perspective

“…The use of network analysis, a relatively new tool in this field of study, appears promising. Stefanovic et al (2022) identified significant differences in PTSD-symptom networks in survivors of type I trauma (single event; sudden and unexpected high-level threat), as against type II (repeated and/or protracted; anticipated) trauma. Given the close relationship between PTSD and moral injury, such analysis may see new patterns of correlation identified between trauma types and symptom networks of moral injury among HCWs, beyond a generalized list of guilty feelings, shame, powerlessness, and anger.…”