2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Remote Laboratories from the Student Perspective

Abstract: The objective of this paper is the identification of the variables which affect the acceptation by the students of two kinds of remote laboratories (photovoltaic panels and electric machines) in Higher Education. To achieve it, the Technology Acceptation Model is used and usability and usefulness are the considered factors. Two pilot experiences are carried out over a sample of 86 students which are studying the Energy Engineering Degree. 45 of them (52.3%) carry out the electric machines lab class and 41 (47.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of students’ response demonstrates their acceptance of remote laboratory as well as the lab which seems useful and effective to share and reduce the costs of engineering education. We achieved the same results of the author [29,30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The analysis of students’ response demonstrates their acceptance of remote laboratory as well as the lab which seems useful and effective to share and reduce the costs of engineering education. We achieved the same results of the author [29,30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Questionnaires are even used to compare different VLs from the student perspective. 78 Due to these facts, a survey was designed to assess the VL. More details to this respect can be found in the ‘Results of the students’ survey’ section.…”
Section: The Teaching Innovative Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is from these that the current EMRPP and PRPP originate. Following the educational approach, in [41] a comparative analysis of both RLs is presented. Finally, [42] displays a solution for transforming a laboratory experiment into a remote experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%