2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing satellites and vegetation indices for cover crop biomass estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of the sampled biomass per crop type, the median and standard deviation values of dry aboveground biomass, the water content, and weed percentages of the field measurements are presented in Table 2. The average biomass for all the crop types is in line with what was reported by other authors [43,62] with values of DAM ranging from 0.69 to 5.08 t•ha −1 . We observed notable variations in DAM values in different groups of plants.…”
Section: Cover Crop Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of the sampled biomass per crop type, the median and standard deviation values of dry aboveground biomass, the water content, and weed percentages of the field measurements are presented in Table 2. The average biomass for all the crop types is in line with what was reported by other authors [43,62] with values of DAM ranging from 0.69 to 5.08 t•ha −1 . We observed notable variations in DAM values in different groups of plants.…”
Section: Cover Crop Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To achieve the main objective of this study, which is devising a robust methodology to estimate winter fallow cover crop biomass in France using Sentinel-2 data, our initial step involved an analysis to determine the most effective combinations of spectral bands, vegetation indices (VIs), and statistical models. Employing a cross-validation approach akin to methodologies previously utilized by Goffart et al [43] and Swoish et al [62], we used the last image before in situ sampling. Subsequently, we scrutinized all VIs and spectral bands through a multivariate approach using different machine learning models, to harness the full spectral data encapsulated within Sentinel-2 imagery considering the last available image before the sampling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have reported higher cover crop biomass predictability when using remote sensing indices in single-species studies [ 18 , 51 , 52 ]. Higher R 2 values ranging from 0.53 to 0.76 for mixed cover crop species was reported by [ 53 ] using Planet imagery. They used several large fields to predict cover crop biomass compared to small plots in the current study, where few pixels were inside each plot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Based on the Planet dataset, our third hypothesis was rejected, and biomass estimation was affected by mixed cover crop species. A previous study using Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope sensors reported that VIs from PlanetScope sensors were most accurate (lower root mean square error and higher R 2 ) for mixed cover crop biomass estimation [ 53 ] when individual sampling sites within the fields were considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDVI index can quantify vegetation greenness, understand vegetation density, and assess plant health changes. NDVI index is calculated using red and near-infrared spectra of the multispectral cameras or from GreenSeeker sensor measurements [34,35], and it can be used to quantify vegetation greenness, understand vegetation density, and assess plant health changes. Due to its versatility and ease of extraction, it is a frequently used vegetation index among farmers and researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%