2015
DOI: 10.1080/02331888.2014.990018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing search and estimation performances of designs based on a compound criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be more precise, we also used the compound criterion given in Talebi and Esmailzadeh (2015) to calculate the estimation and discrimination performances of the rival designs, simultaneously. The criteria are plotted against m in Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be more precise, we also used the compound criterion given in Talebi and Esmailzadeh (2015) to calculate the estimation and discrimination performances of the rival designs, simultaneously. The criteria are plotted against m in Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a comprehensive performance evaluation of design for multitask purposes is desirable. Several researchers have studied such problems and suggested dual‐task design criteria (see Biswas & Chaudhuri, 2002; Hill et al, 1968; McGree & Eccleston, 2008 and; Talebi & Esmailzadeh, 2015). We advance the methodology for efficient designing a factorial experiment by accounting for the missing observations.…”
Section: Dual‐task Design Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%