2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing self-rated health and self-assessed change in health in a longitudinal survey: Which is more valid?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, this implies that respondents might think about their level of cognitive complaints relative to the level of cognitive complaints of those in their surroundings who are not receiving an anti-dementia treatment. Consequently, there might be problems with floor and ceiling effects in the measurements of this concept [39]. Therefore, we suggest future research to modify the measure of self-reported cognitive complaints in such a way that it measures self-assessed change between two measurement moments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this implies that respondents might think about their level of cognitive complaints relative to the level of cognitive complaints of those in their surroundings who are not receiving an anti-dementia treatment. Consequently, there might be problems with floor and ceiling effects in the measurements of this concept [39]. Therefore, we suggest future research to modify the measure of self-reported cognitive complaints in such a way that it measures self-assessed change between two measurement moments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is ample research that suggests caution in using a subjective measure of self-rated health to understand health inequality, with recent studies confirming differences in meaning across age and socioeconomic status and expressing concern over the longitudinal validity of the measure and its ability to capture change in health (eg. Dowd & Zajacova, 2010; Gunasekara, Carter, & Blakely, 2012; Layes, Asada, & Kepart, 2012). Moreover, although evidence suggests that different diseases may involve different causal variables and mechanisms (Galobardes, Lynch, & Davey Smith, 2004) with some, such as heart disease, potentially more strongly linked to early life circumstances than others, studies that focus on one disease give us information on mechanisms and proximal causes for only one specific manifestation of health inequality (Phelan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of experiencing the event of entering poor or very poor health per 100 person‐years in the Russian sample was 5.0 (95% CI: 4.8; 5.3) (Table ), substantially higher than the rate in the British sample (3.9, 95% CI: 3.7; 4.0) (Table ). This result, directly comparing reported change in health in Britain and Russia, should be interpreted with caution because individuals in one of the countries may be more responsive on average to adverse health shocks when reporting self‐rated health (Gunasekara et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%