2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing six video chat tools: A critical evaluation by language teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Video offers an environment closer to face‐to‐face interaction (Yamada, 2009) and has potential for enhancing the effectiveness of communicative language learning. Eröz‐Tuğa and Sadler (2009) and Smyth (2005) also report that students and instructors alike perceive the benefit of video discussion. In particular, the video feature is perceived to add authenticity and allow learners a better opportunity for imitating the facial movements necessary for correct pronunciation of English.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Video offers an environment closer to face‐to‐face interaction (Yamada, 2009) and has potential for enhancing the effectiveness of communicative language learning. Eröz‐Tuğa and Sadler (2009) and Smyth (2005) also report that students and instructors alike perceive the benefit of video discussion. In particular, the video feature is perceived to add authenticity and allow learners a better opportunity for imitating the facial movements necessary for correct pronunciation of English.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As with other emerging technologies, such as short message service (Cavus & Ibrahim, 2009), video chat (Eröz‐Tuğa & Sadler, 2009) and instant messaging (Junco & Cotton, 2011), VoIM is an emerging research field that can benefit from more rigorous empirical studies, which are designed in such a way as to accurately measure both academic and motivational outcomes. As Jarvis (2006) notes, “further research and discussion is clearly needed on how the changes in language, largely driven by CMC, can or should be incorporated into the ELT (English Language Teaching) curriculum.” Such research is essential as technological and instructional developments continue to be made in the area of mobile and ubiquitous learning, including the use of voice‐based (Wang, Shen, Novak & Pan, 2009) and text‐based (Cavus & Ibrahim, 2009) mobile learning platforms for English language learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unclear whether and how these different tools facilitate CSCL in divergent ways. Understanding the affordances of each tool will help teachers to make informed decisions about which one(s) to use in their CSCL activities, rather than resorting to time‐consuming trial‐and‐error approaches (Eröz‐Tuğa & Sadler, ). Here, affordances are conceptualized as the functional properties of technological tools that can enable users to engage in certain kinds of learning or other desired behaviors (for a review, see Dalgarno & Lee, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have highlighted the need for empirical research in the area of computer-mediated communication (CMC) focusing on specific teaching methodologies and techniques that are effective for e-learning. For example, Eroz-Tuga and Sadler (2009) expressed the need for research associated with video conferencing tools; Deutschmann, Panichi and Molka-Danielsen (2009), Hernández-Serrano, González-Sáanchez and Muñoz-Rodríguez (2009) and Warburton (2009) called for research relating to CMC, learning and the use of virtual worlds; and Jones and Plass (2002) identified the need for further research in this area relating to the development of listening comprehension. While Turner (2005) used the term “affordance” to discuss what an online tool can offer students for the purpose of learning, Chapelle (2001), Warschauer and Grimes (2007), Kessler (2010), Bueno Alastuey (2011), Chen and Brown (2011) and Jauregi, Canto, Graaff, Koenraad and Moonen (2011) have all expressed the importance of identifying the affordances of online tools as they may lead to the creation of teaching methodologies that effectively utilise these affordances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%