2017
DOI: 10.17576/mh.2017.1202.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Sterofundin to 0.9% Sodium Chloride Infusion in Managing Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Pilot Study

Abstract: ABSTRAK Penggantian cecair adalah rawatan utama untuk kencing manis ketoacidosis (DKA). Pada masa ini pilihan terbaik daripada cecair masih diperdebatkan. 0.9% Normal Saline (NS) yang menyebabkan ketidakseimbangan metabolik dan asidosis metabolik biasanya digunakan. Sterofundin® merupakan kristaloid & Health Dec 2017;12(2): 179-192 Rossman H. et al. (Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines 2015). The ideal fluid for managing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is controversial. Following substantial fluid loss due … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 In the study conducted by Rossman et al, the length of follow-up was only 12 h due to logistic considerations and financial constraints, consequently there was not enough time for complete resolution of acidosis and ketone clearance. 48 Furthermore, inclusion and exclusion criteria in the evaluated articles differed, for example, Comorbidity Index Scores did not show any differences between the BES and 0.9% Saline-groups in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…50 In the study conducted by Rossman et al, the length of follow-up was only 12 h due to logistic considerations and financial constraints, consequently there was not enough time for complete resolution of acidosis and ketone clearance. 48 Furthermore, inclusion and exclusion criteria in the evaluated articles differed, for example, Comorbidity Index Scores did not show any differences between the BES and 0.9% Saline-groups in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For this reason, we publish the forest plot of this outcome only in the Supplementary material (Additional File .) 3,47–50 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We excluded six trials because five of them were observational studies,[ 14 15 16 17 18 ] and the remaining was a systematic review protocol. [ 19 ] Following the completion of the qualitative synthesis, one study[ 20 ] was excluded due to a lack of outcome interest. Therefore, eight trials involving 595 participants were embraced in the meta-analysis and systematic review [ Figure 1 and Table 1 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%