2016
DOI: 10.1080/21635781.2016.1272018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Strategies to Help Spouses of Service Members Cope with Deployment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the telehealth delivery format of the intervention makes it highly suitable for caregivers in rural or other resource limited environments. This intervention has the potential to increase resilience within caregiving families, [60] sustain gains made in functional recovery through the PSC, and ameliorate the negative impacts of TBI-related disability for caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the telehealth delivery format of the intervention makes it highly suitable for caregivers in rural or other resource limited environments. This intervention has the potential to increase resilience within caregiving families, [60] sustain gains made in functional recovery through the PSC, and ameliorate the negative impacts of TBI-related disability for caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, a variety of programming options varying in intensity and length of services across the emotional cycle of deployment may prove fruitful. For instance, group settings where spouses can normalize their shared experiences of challenges during deployment and reintegration and also celebrate each other’s successes in the process of recognizing their own strength may be beneficial for SMs and civilian partners with overall favorable reintegration experiences who do not need intense intervention (e.g., Nichols et al, 2017). For others with more negative experiences, existing efforts may need to be bolstered by more intensive services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in several studies, in addition to facilitating interaction with coworkers and chiefs, technology is used by soldiers to communicate with their families during deployment, maintaining or even improving family and marital relationships (Barbudo et al, 2014; Merolla, 2010), and enabling the exchange of information for decision-making when necessary (Nichols & Martindale-Adams, 2017). This means that regular and positive communication between the soldier and the family may be an important factor to protect the relationship (Barbudo et al, 2014; Nichols et al, 2017; O’Neal et al, 2018; Pye & Simpson, 2017; Rea, Behnke, Huff, & Allen, 2015), as it helps to keep the soldier engaged with the family dynamics, reducing the adverse effects of the absence (Bóia et al, 2018). However, the difficulty of communicating with the deployed soldier or negative communication might be a risk factor (O’Neal et al, 2018; Rea et al, 2015).…”
Section: Emotional Experiences Of Soldiers and Their Spouses During T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being deployed on a mission is likely accompanied by career progression, personal growth and fulfilment, a pay raise, an opportunity to know different cultures, and the strengthening and clarification of marital relations (Barbudo, Francisco, & Santos, 2014). On the other hand, deployment causes major changes in family dynamics (Bóia, Marques, Francisco, Ribeiro, & Santos., 2018; Nichols et al, 2017; O’Neal et al, 2018; Sheppard, Malatras, & Israel, 2010) and can have both positive and negative effects on marriages (Gewirtz, Degarmo, & Zamir, 2018; Nichols et al, 2017). These effects occur during the several phases of the mission, from predeployment (it starts when news of deployment is released to the family) to postdeployment (after soldier comes home; Pincus, House, Christenson, & Alder, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%