2021
DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2021.1937194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing students’ responses to synchronous written corrective feedback during individual and collaborative writing tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yeh (2014) found that synchronous text-chat collaboration during computer-mediated CW led to better writing products, as participants could receive immediate peer feedback and clarify linguistic elements. However, SWCF during CW tasks remains under-researched , and according to Cho et al (2022), "it would be insightful to capture students' perceptions by employing different methods (e.g., interviews, questionnaires, stimulated recall)" (p. 16).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Review Collaborative Wr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yeh (2014) found that synchronous text-chat collaboration during computer-mediated CW led to better writing products, as participants could receive immediate peer feedback and clarify linguistic elements. However, SWCF during CW tasks remains under-researched , and according to Cho et al (2022), "it would be insightful to capture students' perceptions by employing different methods (e.g., interviews, questionnaires, stimulated recall)" (p. 16).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Review Collaborative Wr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While learners' perceptions of SWCF have gained attention, recent studies (e.g., Cho et al, 2022;Kim, Choi, Kang, et al, 2020; have taken place in face-to-face, paper-based CW settings and targeting adult learners of Korean. More research is needed to examine SWCF in other contexts (e.g., L2 learning settings) and formats (e.g., computer-mediated CW).…”
Section: Student Perceptions Of Synchronous Written Corrective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality occurring in the field is that there are still innumerable students who are not interested in learning English, especially writing skills (Nasir, 2019). They believe that writing is challenging to learn (Cho et al, 2021). They discover it difficult to accomplish tasks related to writing and over time they feel bored following the lesson so that the results of learning writing skills are far from what is expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%