2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing subjective and objective evaluations of player performance in Australian Rules football

Abstract: Player evaluation plays a fundamental role in the decision-making processes of professional sporting organisations. In the Australian Football League, both subjective and objective evaluations of player match performance are commonplace. This study aimed to identify the extent to which performance indicators can explain subjective ratings of player performance. A secondary aim was to compare subjective and objective ratings of player performance. Inside Football Player Ratings (IFPR) and Australian Football Le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The official AFL player rating (AFLPR) produced by Champion Data (Champion Data Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia) was used as the sole game performance rating measure. This metric has previously been used in elite Australian football research (Fahey-Gilmour, Dawson, Peeling, Heasman, & Rogalski, 2019;McIntosh, Kovalchik, & Robertson, 2019;Ryan et al, 2018) while also being established as valid and reliable (Robertson, Gupta, & McIntosh, 2016). The AFLPR is objectively calculated on the basis of changes in 'field equity' (Jackson, 2016;McIntosh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Performance Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The official AFL player rating (AFLPR) produced by Champion Data (Champion Data Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia) was used as the sole game performance rating measure. This metric has previously been used in elite Australian football research (Fahey-Gilmour, Dawson, Peeling, Heasman, & Rogalski, 2019;McIntosh, Kovalchik, & Robertson, 2019;Ryan et al, 2018) while also being established as valid and reliable (Robertson, Gupta, & McIntosh, 2016). The AFLPR is objectively calculated on the basis of changes in 'field equity' (Jackson, 2016;McIntosh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Performance Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metric has previously been used in elite Australian football research (Fahey-Gilmour, Dawson, Peeling, Heasman, & Rogalski, 2019;McIntosh, Kovalchik, & Robertson, 2019;Ryan et al, 2018) while also being established as valid and reliable (Robertson, Gupta, & McIntosh, 2016). The AFLPR is objectively calculated on the basis of changes in 'field equity' (Jackson, 2016;McIntosh et al, 2019). Field equity accounts for the contribution of a player's involvement in the play with reference to a series of contextual factors (e.g.…”
Section: Performance Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… McHale et al (2012) , for example, in an attempt to formulate a soccer player performance rating system, envisaged a hypothetical English National team chosen from the highest ranked players in each position, based on their index scores, and compared the hypothetical team against the actual English team appearing in the first game of the 2010 World Cup. Similarly, McIntosh et al (2019) validated objective performance indicators by comparing them with subjective ratings of player performance in Australian Rules football.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%