Comparing Subjective Similarity of Automated Driving Styles to Objective Distance-Based Similarity

Abstract

Objective This study explores subjective and objective driving style similarity to identify how similarity can be used to develop driver-compatible vehicle automation. Background Similarity in the ways that interaction partners perform tasks can be measured subjectively, through questionnaires, or objectively by characterizing each agent’s actions. Although subjective measures have advantages in prediction, objective measures are more useful when operationalizing interventions based on these measures. Showing how objective and subjective similarity are related is therefore prudent for aligning future machine performance with human preferences. Methods A driving simulator study was conducted with stop-and-go scenarios. Participants experienced conservative, moderate, and aggressive automated driving styles and rated the similarity between their own driving style and that of the automation. Objective similarity between the manual and automated driving speed profiles was calculated using three distance measures: dynamic time warping, Euclidean distance, and time alignment measure. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine how different components of the stopping profile and the three objective similarity measures predicted subjective similarity. Results Objective similarity using Euclidean distance best predicted subjective similarity. However, this was only observed for participants’ approach to the intersection and not their departure. Conclusion Developing driving styles that drivers perceive to be similar to their own is an important step toward driver-compatible automation. In determining what constitutes similarity, it is important to (a) use measures that reflect the driver’s perception of similarity, and (b) understand what elements of the driving style govern subjective similarity.

Incidence and Prevalence of Pain Medication Prescriptions in Pathologies with a Potential for Chronic Pain

“…Euclidean distances (i.e., the length of a line segment between the specific time point on two time series) were measured between the time series for every patient cohort. 26 Euclidean distances were calculated between the time series with the highest incidence and the remaining time series to provide quantitative results for the distance between multiple time series. Finally, year over year percent changes were calculated for every time series by subtracting the more recent value from the older value, divided by the older value, multiplied by 100.…”

Bimodal Trust: High and Low Trust in Vehicle Automation Influence Response to Automation Errors

“…Pilot study data from the manual driving scenarios guided the development of the automated driving style. The aggressive, moderate, and conservative styles were determined using the 15th, 50th, and 85th percentile of driv-ers’ manual driving data such as mean deceleration, mean ac-celeration, distance to the stop line when the speed first goes below 1 mph during the approach to stop-controlled intersec-tions and stop duration at stop-controlled intersections (Domeyer et al, 2019; Kamaraj et al, 2023; J. D. Lee et al, 2021).…”