2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing substance use outcomes by sexual identity among women: Differences using propensity score methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 127 , 128 This is an alarming finding given large pre-pandemic disparities in both alcohol use and mental health between sexual minority women and heterosexual women. 14 , 140 145 More research is needed to understand the stressors and mechanisms underlying the higher rates of alcohol use among sexual minority women during the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 127 , 128 This is an alarming finding given large pre-pandemic disparities in both alcohol use and mental health between sexual minority women and heterosexual women. 14 , 140 145 More research is needed to understand the stressors and mechanisms underlying the higher rates of alcohol use among sexual minority women during the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates and risks for problematic alcohol use vary by sexual identity, 12 14 race/ethnicity, 15 and other factors, including socioeconomic status and relationship status. 16 These differences may be partially explained by differences in stress levels, including economic stressors and psychological distress 17 and may have been further modified by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, differences between the two panel samples may have influenced the findings in the current study. Although research suggests that substance use is typically greater among SMW relative to heterosexual women regardless of the sample or measures used ( Drabble, Trocki, et al, 2018 ; Karriker-Jaffe et al, 2022 ), LGBT specific panels may reach individuals whose characteristics differ (e.g., higher education, greater LGBT identity salience) than LGBT peers recruited from general samples ( Karriker-Jaffe et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%