2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect restorations usually require placement of temporary restoration material prior to its cementation in the next visit, which increases the possibility of coronal microleakage in the interim period. The major concern related to the post placement stems from the risk of perforation as well as poor cementation, which can also lead to microleakage 41 . On the other hand, placement of direct restorations, especially composites, carries the risk of gap formation on the gingival margins, which might provide an ideal path through which bacteria can access the rootfilled canal, compromising the endodontic treatment success 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect restorations usually require placement of temporary restoration material prior to its cementation in the next visit, which increases the possibility of coronal microleakage in the interim period. The major concern related to the post placement stems from the risk of perforation as well as poor cementation, which can also lead to microleakage 41 . On the other hand, placement of direct restorations, especially composites, carries the risk of gap formation on the gingival margins, which might provide an ideal path through which bacteria can access the rootfilled canal, compromising the endodontic treatment success 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, the survival and failure rates of endodontically treated teeth with fiberglass or metal posts are not significantly different. In 2022, Nino Tsintsadze et al considered a total of 188 studies and concluded that both materials can be used with confidence in performing treatment when a significant amount of coronary structure is missing, as the success rate is 92.8% for fiberglass posts and 78.1% for metallic posts [ 60 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, metal posts are rigid and transfer forces along their long axis, increasing the risk of root fracture (Barcellos et al., 2013; Bhuva et al., 2021; Chieruzzi et al., 2012; Tay & Pashley, 2007). A meta‐analysis revealed that fibre posts had higher overall survival rates over the medium term (3 to 7 years) than metal posts (Wang et al., 2019), whilst another meta‐analysis concluded that the overall survival rate for fibre posts was 92.8%, and for metal posts, it was 78.1% (Tsintsadze et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%