2020
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10040126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Targeted vs. Untargeted MS2 Data-Dependent Acquisition for Peak Annotation in LC–MS Metabolomics

Abstract: One of the most widely used strategies for metabolite annotation in untargeted LCMS is based on the analysis of MSn spectra acquired using data-dependent acquisition (DDA), where precursor ions are sequentially selected from MS scans based on user-selected criteria. However, the number of MSn spectra that can be acquired during a chromatogram is limited and a trade-off between analytical speed, sensitivity and coverage must be ensured. In this research, we compare four different strategies for automated MS2 DD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic metabolite annotation was carried out as described elsewhere using the following parameters: spectral libraries: HMDB () and LipidBlast; m / z accuracy in both precursor and fragment ions (5 mDa); weight of m / z and intensity for the calculation of the dot product and reverse dot product (in this study, m = 1.2 and n = 0.9 for dp and rdp , respectively); minimum number of matching ions in the experimental and reference spectra: 3; absolute and relative intensity thresholds in the MSMS spectra: 0.01% of the base peak and 200 AU; and minimum mean dot product : 0.75. Metabolite annotation using LipidBlast was carried out using LipiDex using 0.01 Da tolerances in both MS (precursor) and MS 2 (fragment) data …”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic metabolite annotation was carried out as described elsewhere using the following parameters: spectral libraries: HMDB () and LipidBlast; m / z accuracy in both precursor and fragment ions (5 mDa); weight of m / z and intensity for the calculation of the dot product and reverse dot product (in this study, m = 1.2 and n = 0.9 for dp and rdp , respectively); minimum number of matching ions in the experimental and reference spectra: 3; absolute and relative intensity thresholds in the MSMS spectra: 0.01% of the base peak and 200 AU; and minimum mean dot product : 0.75. Metabolite annotation using LipidBlast was carried out using LipiDex using 0.01 Da tolerances in both MS (precursor) and MS 2 (fragment) data …”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LC–MS features were also excluded if the maximum peak area value in blanks multiplied by 10 was larger than the median value in samples, and those annotated as drug metabolites or food components. Metabolite annotation was carried out based on MS/MS data using the Human Metabolome Database ( http://www.hmdb.ca ) and METLIN ( http://www.metlin.scripps.edu ) databases, and LipiDex (Hutchins et al 2018 ) as described elsewhere (Ten-Doménech et al 2020 ) with 0.015 Da or 20 ppm accuracy. Information regarding classes and subclasses of the metabolites was downloaded from the HMDB ( http://www.hmdb.ca ) and automatically incorporated to the annotation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters employed for HM fingerprinting have been described elsewhere [30]. In summary, OMM and DHM samples were subjected to a single-phase extraction procedure by adding 175 mL of CH 3 OH followed by 175 mL of MTBE [31] and 20 mL of supernatant were added to 80 mL of a CH 3 OH:MTBE (1:1, v/v) solution.…”
Section: Hm Preparation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-processing pipeline for data acquired during the analysis of HM samples has been described elsewhere [30]. For urine, centroid LC-QTOFMS raw data were converted to mzXML format employing ProteoWizard [34] (http://proteowizard.sourceforge.…”
Section: Data Processing and Statistics 241 Metabolomics Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%