Comparing the 1CU Accommodative, Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens

“…However, new rotational asymmetrical multifocal optics allow low near-vision add with apparently no impact on visual symptoms due to the partially optical design. 7 Single-optic accommodating IOLs would circumvent many optical compromises associated with multifocal IOLs, and data in previous studies 4, 10,11,13 show that they enhance functional vision for far to intermediate, with a limitation in near distances for visual tasks.…”

Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses

“…8 Several single-optic IOL models have been developed. It was shown that the near visual outcomes with the preliminary IOL models were limited, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] which was the main reason for the development of new accommodating IOL models. One example is the dual-optic IOL 26 and the new generation of single-optic accommodating IOL.…”

Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Metaanalysis

“…14,15,24 Quality of Methodology Table 2 shows the 4 studies 14,15,22,24 that met the first quality-assessment criterion of having 2 or more of the following: adequate allocation concealment, blinding (patient, outcome assessor), loss to follow-up lower than 30%, and reported use of intention-to-treat analysis. Four studies 14,15,22,24 were above the second criterion of having a quality-assessment score cutoff of 6. The van Tulder et al 6 scores ranged from 4 to 9 out of a total possible 10.…”