2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08036-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the IMRT era

Abstract: Background To compare the prognostic value of 7th and 8th editions of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system for patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost– intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT). Methods Patients with NPC (n = 300) who received SIB-IMRT were included. Survival b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that our primary end point was safety and toxic effects, we do not believe that the change in the staging system would be associated with changes in our end point. Furthermore, 10 patients in the entire cohort may possibly be downstaged given the change in the staging system since the completion of this study, and therefore, we do not feel that excellent treatment outcomes were purely outcomes associated with staging migration from T4 (AJCC Staging Manual, 7th Edition) to T2 (AJCC Staging Manual, 8th Edition) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that our primary end point was safety and toxic effects, we do not believe that the change in the staging system would be associated with changes in our end point. Furthermore, 10 patients in the entire cohort may possibly be downstaged given the change in the staging system since the completion of this study, and therefore, we do not feel that excellent treatment outcomes were purely outcomes associated with staging migration from T4 (AJCC Staging Manual, 7th Edition) to T2 (AJCC Staging Manual, 8th Edition) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotherapy is recognized worldwidely as the primary treatment for non‐metastatic NPC and T4 disease is closely associated with poor prognosis. Based on previous literature reports, the 5‐year survival rate of T4 NPC was 56.5%–68.2%, which is significantly inferior to T1, T2, and T3 NPC 3–7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Based on previous literature reports, the 5-year survival rate of T4 NPC was 56.5%-68.2%, which is significantly inferior to T1, T2, and T3 NPC. [3][4][5][6][7] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was recommended for locally advanced NPC based on the results of twodimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) era. 8 While in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), improved treatment outcomes and lessened side effects were obtained for NPC patients due to the advantages of distributing highly conformal dose to tumor while sparing the adjacent organs at risk (OARs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and the morbidity and mortality arising from it in Southern China, Southeastern Asia, and North Africa are the highest in the world, with poorly differentiated or undifferentiated squamous cell carcinoma being the main pathologic types [1,2]. NPC is a highly invasive tumor, with the majority (up to 70%) being locally advanced at the time of detection [3,4]. The standard of care for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), or CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), or only CCRT is [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%