2021
DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13233.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the acceptability of total diet replacement and food-based low-calorie diets for type 2 diabetes remission amongst Southeast Asians: a public and patient involvement activity

Abstract: Background: With type 2 diabetes prevalence rising at alarming rates, low-calorie diets (total diet replacement and food-based low-calorie diets) are increasingly used to induce weight loss and achieve diabetes remission. The effectiveness of these diets has been primarily tested in the UK white population but not in the Southeast Asian population at high risk of diabetes. Obtaining the opinion of members of the community on what would constitute a culturally acceptable diet is essential for successful interve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research question was developed following a recent patient and public engagement activity carried out in the north of England, 38 which aimed to assess the acceptability of total diet replacement among a group of people of SAP heritage. When this intervention was deemed largely unacceptable by this group, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of previous interventions and, when possible, to identify the more successful trial elements that could assist in the development of more effective and acceptable interventions in this population.…”
Section: Patient and Public Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research question was developed following a recent patient and public engagement activity carried out in the north of England, 38 which aimed to assess the acceptability of total diet replacement among a group of people of SAP heritage. When this intervention was deemed largely unacceptable by this group, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of previous interventions and, when possible, to identify the more successful trial elements that could assist in the development of more effective and acceptable interventions in this population.…”
Section: Patient and Public Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%