1998
DOI: 10.1135/cccc19981394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Acidities of Microporous Aluminosilicate and Silico-Aluminophosphate Catalysts: A Combined Quantum Mechanics-Interatomic Potential Function Study

Abstract: DFT-B3LYP calculations are performed on 4-ring models of aluminophosphates (AlPOs) and silico-aluminophosphates (SAPOs). The results are used to fit the parameters of ion pair shell model potential functions. The potentials obtained are tested in lattice energy minimizations for berlinite and the microporous materials AlPO-18, AlPO-40, AlPO-52, and VPI-5. Not only does the potential reproduce the observed structures (average error of the cell constants 1.3%), it also predicts vibrational frequencies over the w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
27
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For two chabazite catalysts of different composition (the aluminosilicate material H-SSZ-13 and the silico-aluminium-phosphate material H-SAPO-34) we find excellent agreement (within 4 kJ/mol) between the combined QM-Pot result and the full ab initio calculations that apply periodic boundary conditions. 53 This confirms that the combined QM-Pot method takes the long-range effects properly into account.…”
Section: Energies Of Deprotonation (Kj/mol) Calculated By Different Msupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For two chabazite catalysts of different composition (the aluminosilicate material H-SSZ-13 and the silico-aluminium-phosphate material H-SAPO-34) we find excellent agreement (within 4 kJ/mol) between the combined QM-Pot result and the full ab initio calculations that apply periodic boundary conditions. 53 This confirms that the combined QM-Pot method takes the long-range effects properly into account.…”
Section: Energies Of Deprotonation (Kj/mol) Calculated By Different Msupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The values presented for the materials in this work are in the range expected from zeolites, which are indistinguishable in acid strength as measured by this approach. SAPO materials are weaker in acid strength than zeolites [60][61][62], as a result the frequency shift observed on SAPO-34 is the smallest in this work. The BET surface areas agree well with previously reported values; however, the surface area for the commercial MTT catalyst is somewhat low [13,51,[63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Catalytic Testscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…H-SSZ-24 is an aluminosilicate zeolite, while H-SAPO-5 is a silicoaluminophosphate. This difference in composition leads to a difference in Brønsted acid strength [33][34][35], with H-SAPO-5 containing weaker acid sites than H-SSZ-24 [32]. The AFI framework is composed of columns of twisted four-and sixrings, together forming one-dimensional twelve ring channels running parallel to the c-axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%