2020
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the behaviour of spherical beads and natural grains in bedload mixtures

Abstract: It is common to use idealised materials to study the dynamics of granular transport in fluid flows, but the impact of this choice upon sediment behaviour has not been extensively explored. To tackle this research gap, two experiments were undertaken to explore the influence of a finer grain input to a channelized coarser granular flow driven by a shallow fluid flow. The first set of runs was undertaken using spherical glass beads, and the second set with natural fluvial sediment. The transport system approxima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2015; Dudill, Frey & Church 2017; Dudill et al. 2018, 2020). While investigating segregation at the granular scale (usually with discrete methods) is invaluable (Hill & Tan 2014; Ferdowsi et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2015; Dudill, Frey & Church 2017; Dudill et al. 2018, 2020). While investigating segregation at the granular scale (usually with discrete methods) is invaluable (Hill & Tan 2014; Ferdowsi et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics of granular media has been advocated to address segregation at the granular scale and understand geomorphological evolution (Frey & Church 2009. Size segregation largely originates from local interparticle interactions but has huge consequences for the particle size repartition both in the downward and streamwise directions over a much larger scale, potentially affecting sediment mobility and the entire channel geomorphological equilibrium (Gilbert & Murphy 1914;Ferguson et al 2015;Dudill, Frey & Church 2017;Dudill et al 2018Dudill et al , 2020. While investigating segregation at the granular scale (usually with discrete methods) is invaluable (Hill & Tan 2014;Ferdowsi et al 2017;Chassagne et al 2020b), it is also necessary to consider continuum modelling to improve our theoretical understanding and to provide predictions at larger scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment grain interactions can produce vertical, longitudinal or lateral sorting, which lead to very complex and varied morphologies of bed surface and subsurface (such as armouring, bedload sheet, etc.) (Dietrich et al 1989;Recking et al 2009;Frey & Church 2011;Bacchi et al 2014), and can drastically modify the fluvial geomorphological equilibrium (Dudill, Frey & Church 2017;Dudill et al 2018Dudill et al , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean water depth was H = 0.1 m and the mean hydraulic radius was R = W H/(W + 2H) = 0.005 m. This corresponds to a Reynolds number Re = uR/ν ≈ 4800 and a Froude number Fr = u/ √ gH ≈ 1. Grains were fed into the flume at a fixed rate by a 'tinker feeder' grain hopper 64,65 , making the sediment flux a fixed input parameter in our experiments. Once inside the flume, the grains accumulated, forming an aggrading bed until steady-state was reached, at which point the bed stopped aggrading and grains exited the flume, where they were collected by a sediment trap.…”
Section: Laboratory Flume Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%