Comparing the eating out experiences of consumers seeking to avoid different food allergens

Abstract

BackgroundEating outside the home is challenging for consumers with food allergy (FA) and intolerance (FI) and lack of allergen information provision in eating out venues can lead to unnecessary restrictions. Following European legislation (2014) designed to improve allergen information provision, little is known about differences in information provision experienced by consumers seeking to avoid particular allergens, or how this impacts on their eating out experiences. This study compared the information provision that consumers with FA/FI to different allergens experience when eating out.MethodsUsing mixed methods, participants were recruited from across the UK and took part in self-report surveys or in-depth interviews. Surveys were completed by 232 participants avoiding either gluten (n = 66), nuts (peanuts/tree nuts) (n = 94), or milk (n = 74), and responses were subject to quantitative analyses. Interviews were carried out with 49 participants avoiding either gluten (n = 13), nuts (n = 14), milk (n = 13) or a combination of these allergens (n = 9), and analysed using the framework approach.ResultsAlthough general improvements in information provision following the legislation were reported, variations in provision between allergen groups led participants seeking to avoid milk to conclude that their dietary needs were less well-understood and seen as less important. These perceptions were reflected in a reluctance to involve eating out venue staff in deliberations about the potential for milk-free meal options.ConclusionsThe provision of visual indicators of the presence of milk and of staff trained in allergen-awareness would improve the eating out experiences of consumers seeking to avoid milk. Medical professions can play a key role in encouraging these patients to pursue their right to make enquiries about allergens in order to avoid accidental milk ingestion when eating out.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6117-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Food anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom: analysis of national data, 1998-2018

“…While there is increasing recognition of the risks posed by peanut and tree nut allergies, this is not true for cow’s milk allergy. 12 13 Dairy foods form an important part of Western diets. Cow’s milk has a relatively high protein content, so very low levels of exposure can be sufficient to cause reactions.…”

“…Although cow’s milk allergy is relatively uncommon in adults, it was still responsible for 5% of fatal food reactions in adults in the UK. While there is increasing recognition of the risks posed by peanut and tree nut allergies, this is not true for cow’s milk allergy 1213. Dairy foods form an important part of Western diets.…”

Non-Nutritive (Artificial) Sweetener Knowledge among University Students

“…To avoid something, a respondent needs to know what it is they are avoiding, which presumably created a personal need for a base of information to facilitate NNS avoidance; these observations appear to reflect this. A similar establishment of dietary avoidance behaviors and a need for food content knowledge are associated with gluten and food allergies [17,18]. In the present study NNS definition score was not associated with BMI, gender, age, ACT, completion of prior nutrition classes, or history of weight loss attempts.…”

Single dose oral challenges to validate eliciting doses in children with cow's milk allergy

“…[12][13][14] This is probably due to a combination of factors: milk as an ingredient that is ubiquitous in our diets; milk as a high protein food; and lower levels of awareness amongst the public and food business operators that CMPA can cause severe reactions. 15 Reported estimated ED 05 values for cow's milk in the literature range from 0.21 mg to 13.9 mg cow's milk protein. 2,7,16,17 This variation may be partly explained by differences in patient selection, with some studies including younger patients (many of whom may be at various stages of outgrowing their milk allergy) or with lower levels of sensitization, which has been associated with higher levels of reactivity at challenge.…”