2019
DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Effectiveness of Brief Versus In-Depth Gatekeeper Training on Behavioral Outcomes for Trainees

Abstract: Findings suggest certain individuals may benefit from in-depth training more than others, which favors targeting this intervention to particular gatekeepers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The substantial and enduring effects for knowledge, self-efficacy and attitudes may be explained by the interactive nature, flexible and multi-method approach, and length of the gatekeeper training, which perhaps allowed learning and attitude change in more depth. In line with this assumption, Condron et al (17) found that a 2 days gatekeeper training with experience-based learning possibilities lead to more changes, compared to a gatekeeper training of only a few hours, at least for certain participants and outcomes. SUPRA gatekeeper training were not manualized in a strict sense but mandatory elements had to be included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The substantial and enduring effects for knowledge, self-efficacy and attitudes may be explained by the interactive nature, flexible and multi-method approach, and length of the gatekeeper training, which perhaps allowed learning and attitude change in more depth. In line with this assumption, Condron et al (17) found that a 2 days gatekeeper training with experience-based learning possibilities lead to more changes, compared to a gatekeeper training of only a few hours, at least for certain participants and outcomes. SUPRA gatekeeper training were not manualized in a strict sense but mandatory elements had to be included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Prior evaluations of GK training reported that some individual and sociodemographic characteristics may influence the acquisition of skills (Condron et al., 2019; Rallis et al., 2018), but few have reported an association between sociodemographic variables and helping behaviors. Our regression models showed no significant predictors of helping behaviors before training, but level of education was negatively associated with the likelihood of having engaged in helping behaviors in the first 6 months after receiving the training, with no other association between sociodemographic factors and helping behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a study of Veteran’s Administration clinical and non-clinical staff both improved pre- and post-training, but the non-clinical staff had larger gains (Matthieu et al, 2008 ). However, another study found that higher-level professional roles in school settings, including social workers and health professionals, responded best to in-depth trainings (Condron et al, 2019 ). Another study from the Netherlands found trainees in professional roles had similar training outcomes, but healthcare professionals scored highest overall (Terpstra et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While gatekeeper trainings are accepted as appropriate for the general public, they are often conducted with homogenous groups, such as teachers, college students, or nurses. Research that considers individual characteristics suggests that professional role can impact the efficacy of trainings, though the effect may depend on the depth of training (Burnette et al, 2015 ; Condron et al, 2019 ; Cross et al, 2011 ; Lamis et al 2016 ). Beyond professional role, scant research has been done to consider the role of other individual factors including educational attainment on the uptake and retention of suicide prevention knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%