Comparing the effectiveness of metagenomics and metabarcoding for diet analysis of a leaf‐feeding monkey (Pygathrix nemaeus)

Abstract

Faecal samples are of great value as a non-invasive means to gather information on the genetics, distribution, demography, diet and parasite infestation of endangered species. Direct shotgun sequencing of faecal DNA could give information on these simultaneously, but this approach is largely untested. Here, we used two faecal samples to characterize the diet of two red-shanked doucs langurs (Pygathrix nemaeus) that were fed known foliage, fruits, vegetables and cereals. Illumina HiSeq produced ~74 and 67 million paired reads for these samples, of which ~ 10,000 (0.014%) and ~ 44,000 (0.066%), respectively, were of chloroplast origin. Sequences were matched against a database of available chloroplast 'barcodes' for angiosperms. The results were compared with 'metabarcoding' using PCR amplification of the P6 loop of trnL. Metagenomics identified seven and nine of the likely 16 diet plants while six and five were identified by metabarcoding. Metabarcoding produced thousands of reads consistent with the known diet, but the barcodes were too short to identify several plant species to genus. Metagenomics utilized multiple, longer barcodes that combined had greater power of identification. However, rare diet items were not recovered. Read numbers for diet species in metagenomic and metabarcoding data were correlated, indicating that both are useful for determining relative sequence abundance. Metagenomic reads were uniformly distributed across the chloroplast genomes; thus, if chloroplast genomes were used as reference, the precision of identifications and species recovery would improve further. Metagenomics also recovered the host mitochondrial genome and numerous intestinal parasite sequences in addition to generating data useful for characterizing the microbiome.

Early detection of invasive species in marine ecosystems using high-throughput sequencing: technical challenges and possible solutions

“…1). Despite the fact that PCR-free strategies such as DNA capture and direct shotgun sequencing (i.e., metagenomics) have been proposed to avoid biased amplification and/ or due to the lack of universal PCR primers (Taberlet et al 2012), these methods have not been well validated and/ or have limited capacities to recover rare taxa (Zhou et al 2013a;Srivathsan et al 2015;. We therefore focus on the commonly used PCR-method strategy (i.e., metabarcoding strategy; Fig.…”

ECOLOGIA TRÓFICA DE ONÇA-PARDA (Puma concolor) EM PAISAGEM AGRÍCOLA

“…Permitindo o monitoramento da diversidade de presas e predadores, além do entendimento do uso do espaço, biologia reprodutiva, carga parasitária e contato com patógenos (RAOUL et al, 2015;SRIVATHSAN et al, 2015;MARTINS et al, 2015). Estudos tróficos podem contribuir para o aumento da abordagem teórica sobre como a dinâmica dos ecossistemas são influenciados pelos predadores em paisagens com predomínio de atividades humanas (MARkOVCHICk-NICHOLLS et al, 2008;RIPPLE et al, 2014).…”

Rare biosphere exploration using high-throughput sequencing: research progress and perspectives

“…Zhou et al 2013a). Further, in a recent study on diet analysis the authors were unable to recover rare species using metagenomic methods (Srivathsan et al 2014). Consequently, we focus on only commonly used PCR-based methods here.…”