2015
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1077614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effectiveness of respondent-driven sampling and quota sampling in migration research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge this is the first epidemiological survey to use RDS in a non-condition related health survey and to compare the approach to the standard RBS. In contrast to other studies, we did not focus on 'hidden' populations or only on specific migrant groups (Strathdee et al 2008;Montealegre et al 2013;Frere-Smith, Luthra and Platt 2014;Górny and Napierała 2016), but aimed to reach 'hard-to-reach' groups in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge this is the first epidemiological survey to use RDS in a non-condition related health survey and to compare the approach to the standard RBS. In contrast to other studies, we did not focus on 'hidden' populations or only on specific migrant groups (Strathdee et al 2008;Montealegre et al 2013;Frere-Smith, Luthra and Platt 2014;Górny and Napierała 2016), but aimed to reach 'hard-to-reach' groups in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such populations typically have dense social networks, and the structure of social relationships corresponds well with basic RDS assumptions (Tyldum and Johnston, 2014). Recently, researchers in Poland compared the effectiveness of RDS and quota sampling in migration research and found that RDS not only resulted in faster data collection, but also generated higher quality data (Górny and Napierała, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that migration researchers in certain circumstance are left with no choice but to employ non-probability sampling techniques, like snowball or convenience sampling, though that increases the potential risk of bias and omission of large number of migrants (Jacobsen & Landau, 2003) who could provide different perspective to the findings. Due to the absence of adequate sampling frame respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and quota sampling are two common strategies in migration research (Gorny & Napierała, 2016). But, if a research is conducted on a refugee camp run under the UNHCR, there is highly likely that a sample frame is available.…”
Section: Methods In Migration Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%