2010
DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2010.11889480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Active Learning Methods in Business Statistics: Convergence to the Mean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some instructors/researchers have presented anecdotal evidence suggesting that active learning is effective (e.g., Knypstra, 2009;Bates Prins, 2009) and others have presented evidence that students' exam scores are higher when taught with an active learning approach than when taught with more traditional approaches (e.g., Christopher and Marek, 2009;Steinhorst and Keeler, 1995;Ryan, 2006;Yoder and Hochevar, 2005). Although numerous studies have found active learning to be effective, others have found it to have no effect (e.g., Pfaff and Weinberg, 2009) or even to hinder student performance (e.g., Weltman and Whiteside, 2010).…”
Section: Evaluating Active Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some instructors/researchers have presented anecdotal evidence suggesting that active learning is effective (e.g., Knypstra, 2009;Bates Prins, 2009) and others have presented evidence that students' exam scores are higher when taught with an active learning approach than when taught with more traditional approaches (e.g., Christopher and Marek, 2009;Steinhorst and Keeler, 1995;Ryan, 2006;Yoder and Hochevar, 2005). Although numerous studies have found active learning to be effective, others have found it to have no effect (e.g., Pfaff and Weinberg, 2009) or even to hinder student performance (e.g., Weltman and Whiteside, 2010).…”
Section: Evaluating Active Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspect that the key components of successful active learning approaches are using activities to explain concepts and requiring students to demonstrate that they understand these concepts by having them answer very specific rather than general questions. Weltman and Whiteside (2010) were even more critical of active learning approaches than Pfaff and Weinberg (2009). They recently reported evidence that two active learning approaches were not only ineffective but also detrimental to some students.…”
Section: Evaluating Active Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Will flipped classrooms improve the learning process of underprepared students in science courses? The effectiveness of flipped classroom and active learning is not universal among different courses and different populations of students (Weltman & Whiteside, 2010). It has been shown that designing structured in-class activities is equally important as well-prepared videos for effectiveness of the flipped classroom (Zhao & Ho, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfaff and Weinberg (2009) used hands-on data generating activities to enhance students' understanding of statistical concepts. Meanwhile, Weltman and Whiteside (2010) found that active learning was more beneficial for the lower ability than the higher ability students for a group of introductory business statistics students specifically. Fink (2003aFink ( , 2007 provided a holistic view of active learning consisting of three modes or three kinds of learning.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dempsey, Haynes, Lucassen, and Casey (2002) elaborately defined: a game as a set of activities involving one or more players. It has goals, consequences, and constraints.…”
Section: Web-based Game Playingmentioning
confidence: 99%