Comparing the Efficacy of Specs Loop and T Loop for En Masse Anterior Retraction - A Finite Element Study

Murugesan, Arathi; Navaneethan, R

doi:10.1080/27705781.2022.2053388

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This in turn provided a resultant force acting in all three planes providing significant tooth movement. When compared to previous studies by Murugesan and Ramasamy [20] and Chacko et al [12], it was observed that springs with an increased length of wire incorporated in its design produced a greater moment-to-force ratio that enabled significant bodily movement. The HCD spring has an increased wire length incorporated into its structure with the help of coils and loops when compared to the T loop.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Comparing the Efficiency of a Newly Designed Spring With the T Loop for Buccal Canine Disimpaction: A Finite Element Study

TR,

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disimpacting a buccally impacted canine precisely using frictionless mechanics is a challenge in orthodontics. Various mechanics can be used for aligning an impacted canine and a spring is one of the most versatile methods of accomplishing it. The present study describes a newly designed spring for canine disimpaction using the finite element method (FEM) model. In the present study, the efficiency of the newly designed spring was compared with the T loop. The FEM model of the maxilla was prepared. Harsha's Canine Disimpaction (HCD) spring and T loop with no pre-activation bends were utilized to disimpact the left maxillary canine using a 0.017 x 0.025 inch titanium molybdenum alloy wire. Efficiency of both springs in all dimensions (sagittal, vertical and transverse) was compared. Stress acting on the bone and teeth and number of activations needed for disimpaction were evaluated when the spring was activated by 3 mm. A movement/displacement of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.1 mm was seen in the sagittal (X), transverse (Y) and vertical (Z) planes, respectively, with the HCD spring, and 0.4, 0.1 and 0.1 mm seen in the X, Y and Z planes, respectively, with the T loop. A total of 12-13 and 80 activations were required as per the FEM simulation for disimpaction using the HCD spring and T loop, respectively. Stress concentration in the disto-cervical region was observed during disimpaction with both HCD spring and T loop. Within the constraints and limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the HCD spring requires lesser activation and brings about greater control of canine disimpaction in all three dimensions when compared to the T loop.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Comparing the Efficiency of a Newly Designed Spring With the T Loop for Buccal Canine Disimpaction: A Finite Element Study

TR,

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparing the Efficacy of Specs Loop and T Loop for En Masse Anterior Retraction - A Finite Element Study

Cited by 1 publication

References 10 publications

Comparing the Efficiency of a Newly Designed Spring With the T Loop for Buccal Canine Disimpaction: A Finite Element Study

Comparing the Efficiency of a Newly Designed Spring With the T Loop for Buccal Canine Disimpaction: A Finite Element Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About