2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10093209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Hydrological Responses of Conceptual and Process-Based Models with Varying Rain Gauge Density and Distribution

Abstract: Precipitation provides the most crucial input for hydrological modeling. However, rain gauge networks, the most common precipitation measurement mechanisms, are sometimes sparse and inadequately distributed in practice, resulting in an imperfect representation of rainfall spatial variability. The objective of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of different model structures to the different density and distribution of rain gauges and evaluate their reliability and robustness. Based on a rain gauge network… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed approach can enable policy makers to design an optimal and robust rain gauge network that can tackle the uncertainties by selecting optimal sites without the need of additional instrumentation. This result is in accordance with (Yin et al. , 2018), i.e., that for certain areas the rain gauge network configuration is more important than its quantity or density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The proposed approach can enable policy makers to design an optimal and robust rain gauge network that can tackle the uncertainties by selecting optimal sites without the need of additional instrumentation. This result is in accordance with (Yin et al. , 2018), i.e., that for certain areas the rain gauge network configuration is more important than its quantity or density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, the model can not only simulate the dynamic change of runoff process at each point, but also can be used to analyze the impact of changing environment on hydrological processes. Global parameters need to be set to run the model [18]. We used daily-scale simulation results of runoff to compare with the Conv-TALSTM model.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high degree of non-linearity, uncertainty and variability of the hydrological process, even if the model is improved, the runoff simulation may not meet expectations. It will also encounter other problems, such as the same effect with different parameters, difficulty in obtaining data and expensive calculations [17,18]. Data-driven models make predictions by mining the relevant information between input and output variables without studying physical processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the main study area is the drainage basin of Gaoan hydrological station, which is located on Jinjiang River, with an area of 6,215 km 2 (Figure 1). The elevation of the catchment is higher in the northwest, where most tributaries of the Jinjiang River originate, ranging from 18 to 1,096 m (Yin et al 2018). There is no large reservoir in the basin, and it is less disturbed by human activities than other basins.…”
Section: Study Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%