2024
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51362-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the language style of heads of state in the US, UK, Germany and Switzerland during COVID-19

Olenka Dworakowski,
Tabea Meier,
Matthias R. Mehl
et al.

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic posed a global threat to nearly every society around the world. Individuals turned to their political leaders to safely guide them through this crisis. The most direct way political leaders communicated with their citizens was through official speeches and press conferences. In this report, we compare psychological language markers of four different heads of state during the early stage of the pandemic. Specifically, we collected all pandemic-related speeches and press conferences deliver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the data sources are self-reported, and some studies are based on social media such as X (formerly known as Twitter) and online forums. The topics cover psychological intervention [ 26 ], historical data analysis [ 27 ], personality traits [ 28 ], and language differences [ 29 ]. Compared with general situations, people’s decision making in a crisis is more likely to be affected by others on social media.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the data sources are self-reported, and some studies are based on social media such as X (formerly known as Twitter) and online forums. The topics cover psychological intervention [ 26 ], historical data analysis [ 27 ], personality traits [ 28 ], and language differences [ 29 ]. Compared with general situations, people’s decision making in a crisis is more likely to be affected by others on social media.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%