2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the local dynamic stability of trunk movements between varsity athletes with and without non-specific low back pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the muscle activation (EMG) data, two seperate state spaces were created [14]. First, a full 14D state space was defined using the normalized linear envelopes of EMG voltage for each muscle (V), as well as their corresponding time-derivatives (F) [3] …”
Section: Muscular Contributions To Lumbar Spine Rotational Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the muscle activation (EMG) data, two seperate state spaces were created [14]. First, a full 14D state space was defined using the normalized linear envelopes of EMG voltage for each muscle (V), as well as their corresponding time-derivatives (F) [3] …”
Section: Muscular Contributions To Lumbar Spine Rotational Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these continuous EMG linear envelope and stiff ness profiles exhibit nearly periodic dynamics during repetitive trunk movements, Lyapunov exponents can be validly used to characterize their stability [3,13], Moreover, we have recently shown that the ability to maintain stable low back muscle activa tion profiles is impaired in varsity athletes with low levels of low back pain during repetitive unloaded spine flexion [14], displaying the importance of such analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using repetitive lumbar spine flexion-extension movements, local dynamic stability of the lumbar spine was first evaluated by Granata and England (2006). Many studies have since advanced our understanding of spine neuromuscular control by investigating how variables including movement speed (e.g., Granata and England, 2006;Graham and Brown, 2012;Asgari et al, 2015), external load (e.g., Graham and Brown, 2012;Beaudette et al, 2014), low back pain (e.g., Graham et al, 2014;Ross et al, 2015), muscle fatigue (e.g., Granata and Gottipati, 2008;Asgari et al, 2017;Larson et al, 2018), and task asymmetry (Dupeyron et al, 2013;Lee and Nussbaum, 2013) affect dynamic lumbar spine stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stability provided by the trunk muscles is considered meaningful in counteracting sudden, unexpected loading during daily life as well as dynamic, high-intensity activities [8,12]. Hence, optimizing neuromuscular core stability is considered beneficial for protection against sudden, repetitive and excessive overloading of the trunk [8,9,12,13,14,15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of trunk kinematics and posture comparing patients and healthy participants has been discussed as beneficial for extracting the mechanical factors that may be associated with the development, persistence and recurrence of back pain [13,14,20]. However, inconsistent results regarding movement patterns and kinematic variability during gait have been found [2427].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%