2023
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2023.2189804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the mobilising effects of in-person canvassing to postal reminders – experimental evidence from a longitudinal election study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field period was between 16 th June 2021 and 30 th November 2021. See Elis et al (2022), Elis et al (2023) and Goerres et al (2022) for more information on the IMGES II data collection.…”
Section: Description Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The field period was between 16 th June 2021 and 30 th November 2021. See Elis et al (2022), Elis et al (2023) and Goerres et al (2022) for more information on the IMGES II data collection.…”
Section: Description Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 46 boroughs of Duisburg: these are relatively socially homogenous geographic units that each address can uniquely be distributed to • Gender from administrative records: male, female • 4 sampling groups: from Soviet background, Turkish background, other migrant background, no migrant background To mobilize target persons with a lower estimated probability to participate into the survey, a canvassing strategy (Elis et al 2023(Elis et al , 2022 was conducted as an alternative to postal reminders. 2010 target persons (970 Turkish origin, 970 Russian German and 70 natives) were selected into the canvassing group.…”
Section: Nonresponse Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%