2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the percentage of non-overlapping data approach and the hierarchical linear modeling approach for synthesizing single-case studies in autism research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentages of nonoverlapping data varied across intervention categories and were ranked using categories of effect size (Heyvaert, Saenen, Maes, & Onghena, 2015). The highest effect sizes were found in fading and differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Percentages of nonoverlapping data varied across intervention categories and were ranked using categories of effect size (Heyvaert, Saenen, Maes, & Onghena, 2015). The highest effect sizes were found in fading and differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note: Highly effective for PND is equal or larger than 90%, effective for PND between 70% and 90%, questionable for PND is equal or more than 50% but less than 70%, ineffective if PND is less than 50% (Heyvaert et al., 2015). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition of these and other methodological problems has led authors to caution against use of non-parametric summary statistics and methods developed for group-design research. While their flaws differ, each statistical method is compromised in terms of accuracy and bias in estimation and aggregation of treatment effects (e.g., Allison & Gorman, 1994) and moderator analyses (e.g., Haevaert, Saenen, Maes, & Onghena, 2015).…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Single-case Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PND was found by identifying the number of intervention data points that are lower than the lowest data point in the baseline, divided by the total number of intervention data points, times 100. According to Scruggs and Mastropieri (1998), a highly efficient intervention has a PND score equal to or larger than 90% when it is equal to or larger than 70% but smaller than 90% it is an effective intervention, between 50 to 70% is a questionable intervention, and below 50% is an ineffective intervention (Heyvaert et al, 2015). This technique was chosen because it illustrated the consistency of each child's response time with each of the interventions as compared to their original response times at the baseline level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%