2021
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the performance of stacking-based methods for microearthquake location: a case study from the Burträsk fault, northern Sweden

Abstract: Summary Traditional earthquake location relying on first arrival picking is challenging for microseismic events with low signal-to-noise ratio. Over the past years, alternative procedures have been explored based on the idea of migrating the energy of an earthquake back into its source position by stacking along theoretical traveltime curves. To avoid destructive interference of signals with opposite polarity, it is common to transform the input signals into positive timeseries. Stacking-based s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Migration-based source location methods through the utilization of waveform stacking are recent popular approaches as they do not require time-consuming precise pickings of P-and S-wave arrival time [3]. So, this class of methods is preferred to analyze microseismic data with relatively low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared to source location approaches based on the first arrival time difference [4]. However, as a result of the different radiation patterns caused by complex source mechanisms, the waveform stacking from different geophones may cancel out at the true origin time and location [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migration-based source location methods through the utilization of waveform stacking are recent popular approaches as they do not require time-consuming precise pickings of P-and S-wave arrival time [3]. So, this class of methods is preferred to analyze microseismic data with relatively low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared to source location approaches based on the first arrival time difference [4]. However, as a result of the different radiation patterns caused by complex source mechanisms, the waveform stacking from different geophones may cancel out at the true origin time and location [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%