Comparing the Performance of the Ad Hoc Network under Attacks on Different Routing Protocol

Liu, Haiyan; Shang, Zhanlei

doi:10.14257/ijsia.2015.9.6.19

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…DSR enables the network to be entirely self-organised and self-configured without requiring any networking infrastructure or centralised administration. DSR is made up of a route discovery and route maintenance mechanism, enabling nodes to discover and maintain routes in the MANET [6]. Whenever, when a node needs to transmit data packets, it first checks the route cache for an available route to the destination.…”

Section: B Dynamic Source Routing (Dsr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of AODV, DSR and OLSR Performance Under Black Hole Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

2020

SETWM-20, ACBES-20 &Amp; EEHSS-20 Nov. 16-17, 2020 Johannesburg (SA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Black Hole attacks manipulate MANET routing protocols by deceiving nodes sending data into believing that the malicious Black Hole node has the optimal route available for data transmission to the intended recipient node. The ability to implement the appropriate routing protocol is essential in minimising the impact Black Hole attacks have on MANETs. In this study, the AODV, DSR and OLSR protocols were simulated under no attack as well as under Black Hole attack scenarios to determine which of these protocols performs best. The results were analysed using the performance metrics of Throughput, End-to-End delay and PDR. The results of the simulations show that AODV is more vulnerable to Black Hole attacks than DSR or OLSR. Furthermore, the results show that the adverse effects of a Black Hole attack on Throughput, End-to-End delay and PDR were more significant in AODV as opposed to DSR, which had the best overall performance. Future work to analyse the effects that Black Hole attacks have on the performance of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks in terms of mean delay time, packet overhead and memory usage could also be conducted.

show abstract

Section: B Dynamic Source Routing (Dsr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of AODV, DSR and OLSR Performance Under Black Hole Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

2020

SETWM-20, ACBES-20 &Amp; EEHSS-20 Nov. 16-17, 2020 Johannesburg (SA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Different protocols have been evaluated based on measure such as the packet drop rate, the overhead by the routing protocol, end-to-end packet delays and network throughput [10] [12] . The wireless mesh network is regarded as a special type of wireless ad-hoc network.…”

Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Design of AODV Routing Protocol with Maximum Life Time

Moon¹

2017

JIIBC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ad hoc sensor network is characterized by decentralized structure and ad hoc deployment. Sensor networks have all basic features of ad hoc network except different degrees such as lower mobility and more stringent energy requirements. Existing protocols provide different tradeoffs among some desirable characteristics such as fault tolerance, distributed computation, robustness, scalability and reliability. wireless protocols suggested so far are very limited, generally focusing on communication to a single base station or on aggregating sensor data. The main reason having such restrictions is due to maximum lifetime to maintain network activities. The network lifetime is an important design metric in ad hoc networks. Since every node does a router role, it is not possible for other nodes to communicate with each other if some nodes do not work due to energy lack. In this paper, we suggest an experimental ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol to optimize the communication of energy of the network nodes.The load distribution avoids the choice of exhausted nodes at the route selection phase, thus balances the use of energy among nodes and maximizing the network lifetime. In transmission control phase, there is a balance between the choice of a high transmission power that lead to increase in the range of signal transmission thus reducing the number of hops and lower power levels that reduces the interference on the expense of network connectivity. advance the scalability of wireless ad hoc networks compared to wireless managed networks [9] . Ad hoc networks can have minimal configuration and quick deployment in case of emergency situations such as natural disasters or military conflicts. The presence of adaptive routing protocols makes ad hoc networks to be formed quickly. Wireless ad-hoc networks can be classified as mobile ad-hoc network, wireless mesh network and wireless sensor network [14] . The mobile ad-hoc Network has a self-configuring structure of mobile devices connected by wireless links. Each device moves independently in anyway, and changes its links to other devices frequently [11] . It forwards traffic unrelated to its own use, and therefore is a router. The primary issue of the mobile ad-hoc Network is to equip each device to maintain the information needed to properly route traffic. Such network operates by itself or is connected to the larger network. The mobile ad-hoc network is a kind of wireless ad hoc networks that has a routable network on top of a link layer.Wireless 802.11/Wi-Fi network has made the mobile ad-hoc networks a popular research field. Different protocols have been evaluated based on measure such as the packet drop rate, the overhead by the routing protocol, end-to-end packet delays and network throughput [10][12] . The wireless mesh network is regarded as a special type of wireless ad-hoc network.It is a communications network consisted of radio nodes with a mesh topology. It often consists of mesh clients, mesh routers and gateways. The mesh clients are ...

show abstract

Comparing the Performance of the Ad Hoc Network under Attacks on Different Routing Protocol

Abstract: Ad Hoc network is a multi-hop temporary communication network of mobile nodes

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Comparison of AODV, DSR and OLSR Performance Under Black Hole Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Comparison of AODV, DSR and OLSR Performance Under Black Hole Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Experimental Design of AODV Routing Protocol with Maximum Life Time

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About