14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2318084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the performance of various deep networks for binary classification of breast tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is tested in both our current and previous work [1]. In a similar fashion, VGG16 [39], GoogLeNet [40] and AlexNet [13] are trained in TL in [41].…”
Section: Transfer Learning As a New Convnet Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is tested in both our current and previous work [1]. In a similar fashion, VGG16 [39], GoogLeNet [40] and AlexNet [13] are trained in TL in [41].…”
Section: Transfer Learning As a New Convnet Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information about these datasets are summarised in Table 1. In the preprocessing step, all images were segmented into background and tissue and the intensity values of the segmented regions were normalised (Hamidinekoo et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When several regions were detected, connected component analysis was used in the post-processing section and the three largest detected regions were extracted as RoIs. CADi development Based on a comparative study (Hamidinekoo et al, 2018b), among the well-known deep CNNs, the DenseNet was found as an appropriate model for mass classification due to its key characteristic to bypass signals from the preceding layers to the subsequent layers. In our implementations, the DenseNet's growth rate was set to 4 to construct 4 dense-blocks and 3 transition layers in the architecture.…”
Section: Model Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%