2012 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems &Amp; Software 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ispass.2012.6189208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the power and performance of Intel's SCC to state-of-the-art CPUs and GPUs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of low-power manycore processors for HPC is a topic of ongoing research. Totoni et al [14] compared the power and performance of Intel's Single-Chip Cloud Computer (SCC) to other types of CPUs and GPUs. The analysis was based on a set of parallel applications implemented with the Charm++ programming model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of low-power manycore processors for HPC is a topic of ongoing research. Totoni et al [14] compared the power and performance of Intel's Single-Chip Cloud Computer (SCC) to other types of CPUs and GPUs. The analysis was based on a set of parallel applications implemented with the Charm++ programming model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results have shown that for certain kernel algorithms, the proposed architecture could not gain any performance boosts compared with general-purpose CPUs. Moreover, the performance advantages achieved by the propose architecture over the Atom and Cortex processors do not hold for other high-end general-purpose CPUs, such as Intel's Core i7 processor [47]. The references selected in this study are targeting for low-power mobile platforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection distance using the zig-zag antenna is limited to 2 cm in [31]. For example, in a complex MPSoC design with a size L of some centimeters per side, e.g., the INTEL48 core in [95] with L about 2.5 cm, the tiles that are placed in the layout at opposite parts of the MPSoC can have a distance (along the diagonal of the chip) up to 3.5 cm. Moreover, the return loss for the zig-zag antenna is below −10 dB only in the spectrum range from 51 GHz to 66 GHz.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Designed Antenna Vs The State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%