2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the predictive value of the pelvic ring injury classification systems by Tile and by Young and Burgess

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Osterhoff et al compared the Tile and Young-Burgess classification systems with regard to their predictive value on mortality, resuscitation requirements, and associated injuries. 11 285 consecutive patients with pelvic ring fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The authors found no relationship between mortality and fracture pattern for both systems.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Osterhoff et al compared the Tile and Young-Burgess classification systems with regard to their predictive value on mortality, resuscitation requirements, and associated injuries. 11 285 consecutive patients with pelvic ring fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The authors found no relationship between mortality and fracture pattern for both systems.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings correlate with blood transfusion and total fluid resuscitation requirements. 7 During the necropsy, pelvic manipulation was performed, and the mechanism of lesion was clearly traceable, as described by the Young and Brugess classification. In these lateral compression type III lesions, the first anterior-lateral impact causes the rupture of the anterior hemi-pelvis, and continued force application is transmitted to the posterior sacroiliac complex -the pelvic ring becomes disrupted in two points, and opens, hence the name "open-book fracture".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study evaluating both systems, no statistical correlation was identified between mortality rates and classification subgroups. 31 When injuries were classified into larger subgroups -partially stable (Tile B1/B2/B3 and LC I/APC I) and unstable (Tile C1/C2/C3 and LC II/LC III/APC II/ APC III/VS/CM) -a significantly higher mortality rate was noted for unstable Young-Burgess fractures. 31 Similarly, Manson et al 30 highlighted that by dividing the Young-Burgess classification into stable and unstable types, the predictive power of the classification increased with regard to mortality, transfusion requirements and non-orthopaedic injuries.…”
Section: Classification Of High-energy Injuries To the Pelvic Ringmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…31 When injuries were classified into larger subgroups -partially stable (Tile B1/B2/B3 and LC I/APC I) and unstable (Tile C1/C2/C3 and LC II/LC III/APC II/ APC III/VS/CM) -a significantly higher mortality rate was noted for unstable Young-Burgess fractures. 31 Similarly, Manson et al 30 highlighted that by dividing the Young-Burgess classification into stable and unstable types, the predictive power of the classification increased with regard to mortality, transfusion requirements and non-orthopaedic injuries. Taking into account the inherent weaknesses of these classification systems, an individualised patient-specific approach must be employed to consider the patient's haemodynamic stability, the response to resuscitation, the mechanical stability of the pelvis and the associated injuries.…”
Section: Classification Of High-energy Injuries To the Pelvic Ringmentioning
confidence: 98%