2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/biosmart54244.2021.9677850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Quality of Human Pose Estimation with BlazePose or OpenPose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the comparison with the MoCap system, Docekal et al [23] reported a similar result considering AlphaPose and MMPose.The results that we obtained were in line with the literature: BZ -MP performed worse [21,24] FP-AP and TCF-MMP were similar in the evaluation of the human whole-body pose. However, our results reported that FP-AP, trained on Halpe Fullbody, suffered from self-occlusion during the midstance phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the comparison with the MoCap system, Docekal et al [23] reported a similar result considering AlphaPose and MMPose.The results that we obtained were in line with the literature: BZ -MP performed worse [21,24] FP-AP and TCF-MMP were similar in the evaluation of the human whole-body pose. However, our results reported that FP-AP, trained on Halpe Fullbody, suffered from self-occlusion during the midstance phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In 2020, Moro et al [19] used DeepLabCut [20] as a deep-learning pipeline and evaluated joint centres trajectories on chronic stroke survivors during walking, reporting a maximum error of 20 mm. In 2021, Mroz et al [21] compared Blazepose [22] to OpenPose. They found the first algorithm to be often poorly accurate, due to self-occlusion issues.…”
Section: Introductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We instructed each participant to record a video of the STS test using a smartphone placed or held vertically. We processed all videos using OpenPose (Cao, 2018), a widely used 44 , and high-performing 45,46 neural network-based software for pose estimation. For each person present in an RGB image, OpenPose returns the 2D position of 25 body landmarks: the nose, neck, and midpoint of the hips, and bilateral shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles, eyes, ears, first metatarsals, fifth metatarsals, and heels.…”
Section: Video Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BlazePose is a low-powered markerless pose estimation technique and has recently demonstrated the ability to run on inexpensive hardware (Pixel 2 smartphone) [ 27 ]. The approach has been shown to provide a tradeoff relationship with OpenPose, sacrificing some anatomical accuracy for a significant reduction in computational cost in clinical environments [ 28 ]. Consequently, the approach could augment assessments within low-resource settings through deployment on low-powered hardware such as a smartphone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%