Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages

Abstract

BackgroundThe exponential increase in health-related online platforms has made the Internet one of the main sources of health information globally. The quality of health contents disseminated on the Internet has been a central focus for many researchers. To date, however, few comparative content analyses of pro- and anti-vaccination websites have been conducted, and none of them compared the quality of information. The main objective of this study was therefore to bring new evidence on this aspect by comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online sources.MethodsBased on past literature and health information quality evaluation initiatives, a 40-categories assessment tool (Online Vaccination Information Quality Codebook) was developed and used to code a sample of 1093 webpages retrieved via Google and two filtered versions of the same search engine. The categories investigated were grouped into four main quality dimensions: web-related design quality criteria (10 categories), health-specific design quality criteria (3 categories), health related content attributes (12 categories) and vaccination-specific content attributes (15 categories). Data analysis comprised frequency counts, cross tabulations, Pearson’s chi-square, and other inferential indicators.ResultsThe final sample included 514 webpages in favor of vaccination, 471 against, and 108 neutral. Generally, webpages holding a favorable view toward vaccination presented more quality indicators compared to both neutral and anti-vaccination pages. However, some notable exceptions to this rule were observed. In particular, no differences were found between pro- and anti-vaccination webpages as regards vaccination-specific content attributes.ConclusionsOur analyses showed that the overall quality of pro-vaccination webpages is superior to anti-vaccination online sources. The developed coding scheme was proven to be a helpful and reliable tool to judge the quality of vaccination-related webpages. Based on the results, we advance recommendations for online health information providers as well as directions for future research in this field.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2722-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Investigating Italian parents' vaccine hesitancy: A cross-sectional survey

“…Previous research examining this type of information, concerning vaccines, demonstrated that many blog posts and subsequent comments take an anti-vaccination standpoint although the overall quality of pro-vaccination webpages is superior to anti-vaccination online sources. [54][55][56] There were some potential limitations of the current study that must take into account in the interpretation of the results. Firstly, although the associations between the main explanatory variables and the different outcomes of interest were identified, caution should be taken into account when interpreting the results owing to the cross-sectional study design applied, which limited us from making any conclusion on causal relationship between these factors.…”

An audit of the quality of online immunisation information available to Australian parents

“…A previous study by Wolfe and Sharp assessed the pro- or anti-vaccine stance of parental internet search results for immunisation information overseas [6] and found that the search terms and search engine used had a bearing on the amount of pro- or anti- vaccination material returned by the search, and the order in which they were presented. Another study by Sak et al compared the quality of pro- and anti-vaccine web sites, but the sample was not intended to be representative of what a typical parent would see when searching [7]. Finally, a previous unpublished study examined online information available in 2007 [8].…”

Preciso mesmo tomar vacina? Informação e conhecimentosobre vacinasno adolescer

“…Apesar da facilidade em obter múltiplas informações, muitos adolescentes possuem déficit de conhecimento sobre cuidados com a saúde, falta de comunicação adequada com os pais, além das informações recebidas e/ou acessadas na internet de maneira distorcida, impactando nas suas atitudes (29). Compete à equipe de saúde e é papel da Enfermagem (profissional responsável pela sala de vacina) investir em prevenção de riscos e agravos por meio de ações educativas em saúde.…”