2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-016-9397-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the U.S. Decennial Census Coverage Estimates for Children from Demographic Analysis and Coverage Measurement Surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data for the youngest age group (0-9) are not presented in Bureau (2012c), Table C A negative sign reflects an undercount. The signs here are reversed from the source report in order to keep directionality consistent within this publication Figures in BOLD are statistically significantly different from zero Table 7.1 because there is strong evidence that the coverage estimates of young children from DSE in 2010 are problematic (O'Hare et al 2016). For information on the Census coverage of young Hispanic children in the 2010 Census see the analysis of DA data later in this Chapter.…”
Section: Net Undercount Rates Of Hispanic Adultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data for the youngest age group (0-9) are not presented in Bureau (2012c), Table C A negative sign reflects an undercount. The signs here are reversed from the source report in order to keep directionality consistent within this publication Figures in BOLD are statistically significantly different from zero Table 7.1 because there is strong evidence that the coverage estimates of young children from DSE in 2010 are problematic (O'Hare et al 2016). For information on the Census coverage of young Hispanic children in the 2010 Census see the analysis of DA data later in this Chapter.…”
Section: Net Undercount Rates Of Hispanic Adultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…8.1. Data for the youngest ages (0-9) are not presented in Table 8.1 because there is strong evidence that the coverage estimates of young children from DSE in 2010 are problematic (O'Hare et al 2016).…”
Section: Census Coverage Of the Black Population By Age And Sexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 10.1 shows net undercount rates from DSE for American Indians and Alaskan Natives Alone or in Combination and Non-Hispanic Whites Alone broken down by age and sex. Data for the children under age 10 are not provided in Table 10.1 because there is strong evidence that the DSE coverage estimates of young children are problematic (O'Hare et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%