2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-2698-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the wake behind circular and elliptical cylinders in a uniform current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, in-depth explorations of accelerated wakes and their complex aerodynamics have been primarily confined to simple flows past isothermal or heated cylinders [33,34,[53][54][55]. Moreover, it is established that the coherent structures in the wake of a sphere differ significantly from those behind other bluff bodies such as circular cylinders, presenting unique challenges and opportunities for detailed flow analysis [56,57]. The literature indicates that various approaches have been considered to capture the unsteadiness of the aerodynamic load on a static sphere, providing reliable correlations to calculate fluid forces and field fluctuations [13,27,58] as well as quantitative measurement of high-order metrics [23,28,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in-depth explorations of accelerated wakes and their complex aerodynamics have been primarily confined to simple flows past isothermal or heated cylinders [33,34,[53][54][55]. Moreover, it is established that the coherent structures in the wake of a sphere differ significantly from those behind other bluff bodies such as circular cylinders, presenting unique challenges and opportunities for detailed flow analysis [56,57]. The literature indicates that various approaches have been considered to capture the unsteadiness of the aerodynamic load on a static sphere, providing reliable correlations to calculate fluid forces and field fluctuations [13,27,58] as well as quantitative measurement of high-order metrics [23,28,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%