2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0033969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing theory-based condom interventions: Health belief model versus theory of planned behavior.

Abstract: Except for attitudes, the mediators that were successfully manipulated by the interventions (i.e., perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and attitudes) were not the same constructs that predicted intentions (i.e., attitudes and condom use self-efficacy), and subsequently predicted behavior. This suggests that the constructs that explain behavior are not the same as those that produce behavior change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
72
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
72
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that the theoretical grounding of the intervention did not matter may reflect the fact that the most prominent health behavior theories rely on a similar set of constructs (see Table 1). To the extent that investigators identify explicit distinctions among theories in how these constructs influence behavior, more focused experimental comparisons may be informative (see Montanaro & Bryan, 2014). Similarly, investigators may also want to consider theoretically grounded tests of differential effects of these constructs across populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation that the theoretical grounding of the intervention did not matter may reflect the fact that the most prominent health behavior theories rely on a similar set of constructs (see Table 1). To the extent that investigators identify explicit distinctions among theories in how these constructs influence behavior, more focused experimental comparisons may be informative (see Montanaro & Bryan, 2014). Similarly, investigators may also want to consider theoretically grounded tests of differential effects of these constructs across populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these developments may help youth form and maintain successful romantic relationships, they may also play a direct role in the abandonment of condom use. Condom use is an interpersonal behavior that is laden with social constructions and consequences 7 , particularly in the context of adolescent romantic relationships. Thus, research on adolescent condom use that focuses exclusively on individual motivations, while certainly an important piece of the puzzle, may not produce a complete picture of the determinants of the behavior, especially for female youth 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge about sexual risk does not, in fact, translate to protected health behavior including condom use 6 . Further, evaluation of traditional psychosocial constructs including attitudes, intentions, norms, and self-efficacy about condom use show promise 7 , but do not fully account for this behavioral gap 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the TPB has predicted 33 and 43 % of the intention to use condoms in young people [15][16][17], the intention to refuse sex with a new partner [18] or the intention to use contraception [19]. In a meta-analysis by Albarracin, Johnson, Fishbein and Muellerleile, a total of 96 studies using the TPB as a basic model to explain the condom use were examined [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%