Quantitative Anthropology 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-812775-9.00007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Two Groups: t-Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a t-test is applied for comparing the means of two groups of data; it determines whether the means of the two groups are equal ( Helsel et al., 2020 ). ANOVA is analogous to a t-test between three or more data groups and is governed by the same assumptions as to the t-test ( Williams and Quave, 2019 ). When two groups of elements such as Fe and Mn have equal means, it may suggest that they have similar origin ( Nnorom et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Review Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a t-test is applied for comparing the means of two groups of data; it determines whether the means of the two groups are equal ( Helsel et al., 2020 ). ANOVA is analogous to a t-test between three or more data groups and is governed by the same assumptions as to the t-test ( Williams and Quave, 2019 ). When two groups of elements such as Fe and Mn have equal means, it may suggest that they have similar origin ( Nnorom et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Review Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their corresponding non-parametric tests are available for use when non-normality is suspected/ascertained. For instance, Spearman correlation instead of Pearson correlation, Wilcoxon Rank test in place of two-sample t-test, or the Kruskal Wallis test instead of ANOVA should be used ( Williams and Quave, 2019 ). These nonparametric tests have been said to exhibit greater power than do parametric tests in the presence of skewness and outliers ( Helsel et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Review Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumes as null hypothesis that data come from a standard normal distribution, which was here rejected at a 5% of significance level. When data for patients maintaining SR and relapsing to AF came from normal distributions, a Student’s t -test was used to assess statistical separability between them [ 59 ]. Otherwise, a Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for that purpose [ 60 ].…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%