Comparing ultrasound-guided and fiberscope-guided intubation

Wang, Shiyu; Xue, Fu‐Shan; Liu, Ya‐Yang

doi:10.1007/s00540-017-2421-4

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I agree with Wang et al [1] that the experience in ultrasound-guided tracheal intubation is critical for its success. The operator in the ultrasound group has been stated to have 7 years of experience in the application of ultrasound in the airway and the intensive care including confirmation of tracheal intubation.…”

supporting

confidence: 81%

“…To the Editor: I would like to thank Wang et al [1] for their interest in our study comparing the fiberscope and the ultrasound guided techniques for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Actually, in the technique described in the study, the rigid neck collar was removed before tracheal intubation to shape the tracheal tube mounted over the stylet according to the previous lateral view X-ray taken in the neutral position.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ultrasound versus fiberscope-guided tracheal intubation

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

supporting

confidence: 81%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasound versus fiberscope-guided tracheal intubation

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sixthly, it is worth mentioning that experience and capability are critical to the successful of any techniques in clinical application. In terms of the possible bias in a randomized controlled trial, the operators must be able to be proficient in the techniques studied [13], even all of the tracheal intubation in this study were performed by a specified anesthesiologist who were skilled in using the ultrasound and SOS in tracheal intubation. Finally, this study was performed in a single center on a relatively small number of patients and the results need to be confirmed by multicenter studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasound-guided versus Shikani optical stylet-aided tracheal intubation: a prospective randomized study

Wang

Ping

et al. 2020

BMC Anesthesiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To compare ultrasound-guided tracheal intubation (UGTI) versus Shikani optical stylet (SOS)-aided tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated normal airway. Methods: Sixty patients aged 18-65 years old who presented for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited in this prospective randomized study. They were assigned into two equal groups, either an ultrasoundguided group (Group UG, n = 30) or an SOS-aided group (Group SOS, n = 30). After the induction of anesthesia, the tracheal intubation was performed by a specified skilled anesthesiologist. The number of tracheal intubation attempt and the duration of successful intubation on the first attempt were recorded. Complications relative to tracheal intubation including desaturation, hoarseness and sore throat were also recorded. Results: The first-attempt success rate is 93.3% (28/30) in Group UG and 90% (27/30) in Group SOS (P = 0.640). The second-attempt was all successful for the 2 and 3 patients left in the two groups, and the overall success rate of both groups was 100%. The duration of successful intubation on the first attempt of Group UG was not significantly different from that of Group SOS (34.0 ± 20.8 s vs 35.5 ± 23.2 s, P = 0.784). One patient in Group SOS had desaturation (P = 0.313), and there was none hoarseness in the two groups. Sore throat was detected in both group (4 in Group UG, 5 in Group SOS, P = 0.718). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided tracheal intubation was as effective as Shikani optical stylet-aided tracheal intubation in adult patients with anticipated normal airway.

show abstract

“…Sixthly, it is worth mentioning that experience and capability are critical to the successful of any techniques in clinical application. In terms of the possible bias in a randomized controlled trial, the operators must be able to be pro cient in the techniques studied, 13 even all of the tracheal intubation in this study were performed by a speci ed anesthesiologist who were skilled in using the ultrasound and SOS in tracheal intubation. Finally, this study was performed in a single center on a relatively small number of patients and the results need to be con rmed by multicenter studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasound-guided versus Shikani optical stylet-aided tracheal intubation: a prospective randomized study

Wang

Ping

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To compare ultrasound-guided tracheal intubation (UGTI) versus Shikani optical stylet (SOS)-aided tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated normal airway.Methods: Sixty patients aged 18-65 years old who presented for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited in this prospective randomized study. They were assigned into two equal groups, either an ultrasound-guided group (Group UG, n=30) or an SOS-aided group (Group SOS, n=30). After the induction of anesthesia, the tracheal intubation was performed by a specified skilled anesthesiologist. The number of tracheal intubation attempt and the duration of successful intubation on the first attempt were recorded. Complications relative to tracheal intubation including desaturation, hoarseness and sore throat were also recorded.Results: The first-attempt success rate is 93.3% (28/30) in Group UG and 90% (27/30) in Group SOS (P=0.640). The second-attempt was all successful for the 2 and 3 patients left in the two groups, and the overall success rate of both groups was 100%. The duration of successful intubation on the first attempt of Group UG was not significantly different from that of Group SOS (34.0±20.8s vs 35.5±23.2s, P=0.784). One patient in Group SOS had desaturation (P=0.313), and there was none hoarseness in the two groups. Sore throat was detected in both group (4 in Group UG, 5 in Group SOS, P= 0.718).Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided tracheal intubation was as effective as Shikani optical stylet-aided tracheal intubation in adult patients with anticipated normal airway.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IIC-17010875. Date of Registration: 15 March 2017.

show abstract

Comparing ultrasound-guided and fiberscope-guided intubation

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Ultrasound versus fiberscope-guided tracheal intubation

Ultrasound versus fiberscope-guided tracheal intubation

Ultrasound-guided versus Shikani optical stylet-aided tracheal intubation: a prospective randomized study

Ultrasound-guided versus Shikani optical stylet-aided tracheal intubation: a prospective randomized study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About