2021
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2021.1927928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing user-content interactivity and audience diversity across news and satire: differences in online engagement between satire, regular news and partisan news

Abstract: Normative theory on the functioning of the public sphere requires citizens to actively engage with the information that is provided to them. For a long time, however, the possibilities of user-content interactivity have been limited due to the one-directionality of the traditional mass media. Moreover, a re-occurring question is to what extent less-versus-more entertaining forms of news evoke audience engagement. This study analyzes the user-content engagement on online platforms in response to journalistic co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings discussed here do not only contribute to the scientific literature on the effects of comments, but they are also societally relevant for at least two reasons. First, they advance the understanding of what potential impact political satire has on its audience when it is accessed through social media (also see Boukes et al, In press): Viewers’ experiences and knowledge gain of political satire are not only dependent on the political satire itself, but also partly shaped by the social context in which political satire videos are embedded. Second, the findings of this study may make individuals more aware of the potential impact that comments may have on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings discussed here do not only contribute to the scientific literature on the effects of comments, but they are also societally relevant for at least two reasons. First, they advance the understanding of what potential impact political satire has on its audience when it is accessed through social media (also see Boukes et al, In press): Viewers’ experiences and knowledge gain of political satire are not only dependent on the political satire itself, but also partly shaped by the social context in which political satire videos are embedded. Second, the findings of this study may make individuals more aware of the potential impact that comments may have on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…People increasingly watch and share television shows via YouTube and other social media platforms (Gottfried and Shearer, 2017); political satire is a prominent example of this (Baym and Shah, 2011; Boukes et al, In press). On such online platforms, users are exposed not only to the selected media content, but also to the social context in which this is presented, consisting of user comments and statistics about the number of (dis)likes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tewksbury et al (2001) found that the frequency of internet use was positively correlated with incidental exposure to news on the internet, while incidental news exposure was positively correlated with the acquisition of current affairs knowledge. This was verified by Boukes et al (2022), whose survey confirmed that frequent use of Twitter can positively influence the acquisition of knowledge of current affairs. Regarding the influence of media platforms on knowledge dissemination, Jerit et al (2006) believed that the diversity of information disseminated in platforms was conducive to the learning of public knowledge and the improvement of citizens' knowledge literacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although it is unknown how many foreign produced satire is being consumed, such clips are regularly promoted by U.S. celebrities, 6 E.g., https://twitter.com/samuelljackson/status/966060490219597824 . interacted with on social media ( Boukes et al. 2022 ) and picked up by U.S. mass media (e.g., Donadio and Stack 2017 ; Lopez 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%