2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2020.110814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing vibrational sum frequency generation responses at fused silica and fluorite/liquid ethanol interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…stretching mode. 33 For the interface of the water−ethanol mixtures, the 2876 cm −1 Fermi resonance and the 2924 cm −1 symmetric C−H stretching mode of the CH 3 group govern the SFG spectra in the C−H range, 36 while the 2970 cm −1 antisymmetric C−H stretching mode and the C−H stretching mode of the CH 2 groups are weakin line with a previous study. 20 At the interface of the aqueous binary mixture of formic acid with air, a single peak is observed at 2930 cm −1 , which arises from the C−H stretching mode of formic acid.…”
Section: IIsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…stretching mode. 33 For the interface of the water−ethanol mixtures, the 2876 cm −1 Fermi resonance and the 2924 cm −1 symmetric C−H stretching mode of the CH 3 group govern the SFG spectra in the C−H range, 36 while the 2970 cm −1 antisymmetric C−H stretching mode and the C−H stretching mode of the CH 2 groups are weakin line with a previous study. 20 At the interface of the aqueous binary mixture of formic acid with air, a single peak is observed at 2930 cm −1 , which arises from the C−H stretching mode of formic acid.…”
Section: IIsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The SFG spectra at the air–aqueous binary mixture of the methanol interface show peaks at 2840 and 2960 cm –1 and a shoulder at 2930 cm –1 , which are assigned to the symmetric C–H stretching mode, the antisymmetric C–H stretching mode, and the Fermi resonance of the C–H stretching and C–H bending modes, respectively. Despite earlier assignments to the Fermi resonance, a recent study provides evidence for the ∼2960 cm –1 band to be due to the antisymmetric CH 3 stretching mode . For the interface of the water–ethanol mixtures, the 2876 cm –1 Fermi resonance and the 2924 cm –1 symmetric C–H stretching mode of the CH 3 group govern the SFG spectra in the C–H range, while the 2970 cm –1 antisymmetric C–H stretching mode and the C–H stretching mode of the CH 2 groups are weakin line with a previous study . At the interface of the aqueous binary mixture of formic acid with air, a single peak is observed at 2930 cm –1 , which arises from the C–H stretching mode of formic acid .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fermi resonance coupling coefficient quantifies the coupling strength of two nearly degenerate states. Hou et al have applied this model to support their results that the Fermi resonance mode is more suppressed at the SiO 2 /CH 3 CD 2 OH ( W = 25 ± 2 cm –1 ) interface than at the CaF 2 /CH 3 CD 2 OH interface ( W = 30 ± 1 cm –1 ) Figure c displays our calculated Fermi resonance coupling coefficients plotted as a function of the increasing MeOH mole fraction for MeOH/MeCN- d 3 mixtures.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Recent reports have shown that the intermolecular interactions of neighboring molecules at the interface may be quantified by the SFG intensity ratio of the Fermi resonance and the methyl symmetric stretch. For instance, Tian et al have established a method to deduce the total intermolecular interactions of phospholipids in a monolayer by relating it to the second-order Fermi resonant signal . A relationship between the intensity ratio, R , of the Fermi resonant mode and the methyl stretching mode established an effective method to relate increasing neighboring phospholipid interactions to the Fermi coupling strength with increasing surface pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation